Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime, other, However, argue that the circumstances of an individuals and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken in to account when the deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both view and give your opinion?
Rapidly Increasing of crime rate is a common problem globally. Therefore, some individuals believe that a stable punishment should be applied for every crime. However, some argue that belief, attention, motivation and reason for crime should be sorted out before announcing any imprisonment. This essay will discuss both views before formulating the opinion.
Perhaps the most tangible reason for the fixed punishment is burgeoning of crime rate swiftly. Exploring of violation on daily basis leads to make strong laws to mitigate such activities. Hence, due to absence of strict laws, majority of anti-social aliments commit crime against weaker sections. Thus, if there is a flexible clause will introduce then the crime rate will not intensify because of fear of stable sentencing. Consequently, the numerous people are demanding for such type of laws that are not favour of any hearing from criminal. For instance, some nations in Middle-east has not any provision of any trail which accused can submit any evidence before declaring any result of any verdict.
On the other hand, Individuals who are favour of proper prosecution of offences are demanding for appropriate trails before announcing any decision. Therefore, it is very indispensible for any jury to assume the case by sorting out such aspects like motivation, ground facts of crime, attention and modus operandi. Moreover, sometimes some persons may be victim of such cases just because of not presenting evidence for their acquisition. So as human rights of human being it should be imperative of have fair judgement on the behalf of proper hearing and trails. For example, in INDIA, every crime punishment is being sorted out on the base of evidence provided.
To sum up, no-doubt, some people are very concern about regularly happening of crime. Therefore, the demand for an appropriate rule for every crime has been raised. However, while declaring of any result of case, it would ne imperative to have proper trails and hearing of evidence before formulating final decision. In my view, the causes for committing and flexible judgment procedures of any crime should be classified to reduce the crime rate in society,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...erdict. On the other hand, Individuals who are favour of proper prosecution of offence...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied to reduce the crime rate in society,
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26857142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7614015962 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0358972673 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0526315789 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343284475107 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115662310206 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104688406396 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240030161214 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078660049116 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.