City are now expanding, the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or disagree?

Nowadays, cities are becoming bigger than ever that require safe transport and road system for the betterment of the public. It can be agreed that the government should develop better networks for the public transport, while on the other hand stands a perspective that the management should build roads for private vehicles access. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that by constructing better networks for public transport, the government can reduce the level of carbon dioxide that can reduce the problem of global warming. Moreover, making solid public transport networks will not only help to overcome the problem of traffic jams, but it will also improve the commute efficiency. Thus, needless to say, all these benefits can benefits the people and to our environment.

Notwithstanding, some people tend to believe that facilitating to the car ownership by creating more roads can be benefit to the people who cannot travel in buses and trains. People who have some physical disabilities most likely to use their own transport and building more roads can help them to migrate from one place to another without any hurdle. For example, according to the research, the US government made extra roads for private motor access and helped the people to reach to their destination on time. Therefore, building more roads can play a vital role in the life of disable people.

To recapitulate, in view of arguments outlined above one can conclude that despite having some benefits of building tracks for private services, the merits of making better networks for public transport in improving travel efficiency is instrumental indeed.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... traffic jams, but it will also improve the commute efficiency. Thus, needless to say, all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16780821918 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68705142407 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7881652874 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370904052636 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12403902788 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106542090841 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219401352189 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854527222904 0.0609392437508 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.