some people believe charity organization should only offer help to people of their own countries Other claim that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live Discuss both opinions and tell which side do you agree

Since the beginning of globalisation, various kinds of help have been provided by charity organisations to all indigent folks. However, most masses reckon that charity organisations should barely bestow the assistance in deprived areas of their countries, while other strata hold the view that they should confer aid to every needy person no matter where they live. I endorse the latter statement and would present immense arguments surrounding my opinion further.
There are plenty of reasons why Charity organisations should only provide aid in their nation. First and foremost, it is irrefutable that many organisations collect the money from native people in the form of taxes. Thus, the onus lies on the authorities to give priority to their country's population, despite giving the money to other Nations. Moreover, regimes should give aid to needy people in their nation, especially those who live in shanty areas. This is because poverty level is much higher in these areas, which correlated with petty crimes and criminals. So, in this way, organisations not only able to ameliorate the life standard of people but also can improve infrastructure of the nation.
On the contrary, people strongly believe that Charity organisation should render the help in other nations, albeit little. In this way, they can reinforce the relations of nations, which would be a great initiative to control wars between countries. Even, in many nations, charity organisations spent a remarkable amount of money. A salient example of this is Japan. Many people died in the aftermath of tsunami and organisations assist Japan's people by saving their lives and rebuilding the buildings.
Another point to be taken is that host nations also get benefits when organisations help the people of other countries to eliminate their problems. For example, if a country grapple with perilous diseases like AIDS and cancer. So, it would be an ideal step to get rid of these assortment ailments. In this way, organisation help the government to curb these diseases being dissemination
To conclude, although it is a responsibility of Charity organisation to help all needy and poor people, they should also provide aid in other countries, which would indirectly valuable for whole globe.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29085872576 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84891970584 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562326869806 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0701322935 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312528936481 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988421764726 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705237542545 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178127156779 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475943941581 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.