It might be possible the allocating more budget for advertisement of Super screen will increase the viewers , but this argument remains unsubstantiated. Author's argument does not seem cogent. There are some holes in argument.
Marketing department has generated the report. Author should mention, on what basis that report is generated. One possibility is department has taken online survey for the movie. The question raises the how much genuine that survey is. What methodology they have used to generate the overall report that bolster their argument. Author claims that very few people have attended the Super-screen produced movies is because of small budget of advertisement, without any evidence. Department should gather the possible causes for this. It is possible that there is increase in piracy in last year, so people are reluctant to spend money on Super-screen movies.
Author's is claiming that percentage of positive reviews has increased over last year. Increase in advertisement will help to reach positive reviews to the people.But it is possible that only people who liked the Super-screen reviews has only provided the review. How the author is sure that people who don't liked the movie have provided the reviews? The claim that quality of movies is not the issue, but quality is not the only parameter on which your people decide to watch movies. Movie might not have a good story, or acting on which quality of movie does not matter a lot. Company should consider the users choice and trending. Department should also take into consideration the cost Super-screen movies that viewer need to pay. It is possible that Movie Theaters are charging more for the users and user is not satisfied with the service he is getting for cost.
Author need to consider these all the possible causes and then request for the increase in budget, otherwise, it will be waste of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f Super screen will increase the viewers , but this argument remains unsubstantiat...
^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...rvey for the movie. The question raises the how much genuine that survey is. What metho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther the possible causes for this. It is possible that there is increase in pirac...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...to reach positive reviews to the people.But it is possible that only people who lik...
^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... How the author is sure that people who dont liked the movie have provided the revie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... movies is not the issue, but quality is not the only parameter on which your peo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272189349112 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.195266272189 0.15541462614 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0710059171598 0.0836205057962 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0384615384615 0.0520304965353 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0266272189349 0.0272364105082 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10650887574 0.125424944231 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0414201183432 0.0416121511921 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6417643244 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207100591716 0.026700313972 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00295857988166 0.001811407834 163% => OK
Determiners: 0.094674556213 0.113004496875 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0295857988166 0.0255425247493 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0295857988166 0.0127820249294 231% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1903.0 2731.13054187 70% => OK
No of words: 311.0 446.07635468 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11897106109 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389067524116 0.378187486979 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263665594855 0.287650121315 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183279742765 0.208842608468 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.096463022508 0.135150697306 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6417643244 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 207.018472906 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511254019293 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 51.9238702034 52.1807786196 100% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.55 23.2022227129 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6094640677 57.7814097925 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.15 141.986410481 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 23.2022227129 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 0.724660767414 28% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 41.9165594855 51.9672348444 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.61363636364 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323513097413 0.441005458295 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136818393497 0.135418324435 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114764682226 0.0829849096947 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48192866594 0.58762219726 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177087379218 0.147661913831 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12208524186 0.193483328276 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714147173748 0.0970749176394 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356445519239 0.42659136922 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.142944873192 0.0774707102158 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204136241987 0.312017818177 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808332953158 0.0698173142475 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.82512315271 166% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.