The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.
"On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals."
The editorial conclude that the council will attain 50 percent reduction by reducing number of rentals, from disjointed and incomplete data. To support this conclusion the editorial required more evident that cites the reasons for accidents.
Firstly, argument said that by reducing 50 percent of number of rentals of mopeds per day, seaville island had attained 50 percent reduction in accidents between mopeds and pedestrians, so balmer island also will attain this scenario. The proponents of the editorial does not provide similarity between this two island, how much population was there in this two islands, how many companies available on both islands for rental of mopeds, and increase in population in summers as well. The argument needs more information that cites similarities of both the islands, that writer can conclude proper assertion.
Secondly, the proponent of argument said that to reduce number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council should limit the number of mopeds rented by rental companies from 50 to 25, but what number of rental companies exists on that island? The assertion required more data on number of companies available on island who gives mopeds on rental. By reducing 50 percent of mopeds that company can rent, would not necessarily reduce the accidents, but that percent can be calculated on the basis of companied available there on island who rents the mopeds.
Furthermore, how much population was there before summers and what is the percent of owners who owns a moped. May be there are owners of moped in balmer island is more then in seaville island. The proponent can not deduce any relation for decreasing number of rentals of mopeds per day without any proper comparison between owner of the moped in this two island and also have to consider the total companies available for rentals. If there are more owner of moped in balmer island, then affect of reduction in number of rentals per day is very small.
In general, it may be said that writer has failed to make a convincing argument that by reducing number of rental per day of moped form 50 to 25 as seaville island council did in the past, that also will attain 50 percent of reduction in balmer island as well. The argument necessarily needs accurate data that cites some similarity of both the islands
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...wners of moped in balmer island is more then in seaville island. The proponent can n...
^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'owner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: owner
...ies available for rentals. If there are more owner of moped in balmer island, then affect ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'owners'?
Suggestion: owners
...vailable for rentals. If there are more owner of moped in balmer island, then affect ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.286396181384 0.25644967241 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.138424821002 0.15541462614 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0596658711217 0.0836205057962 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.054892601432 0.0520304965353 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00238663484487 0.0272364105082 9% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.18138424821 0.125424944231 145% => OK
Participles: 0.0381861575179 0.0416121511921 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57432391548 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0143198090692 0.026700313972 54% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0859188544153 0.113004496875 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0238663484487 0.0255425247493 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0238663484487 0.0127820249294 187% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2341.0 2731.13054187 86% => OK
No of words: 389.0 446.07635468 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01799485861 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.57801047555 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.411311053985 0.378187486979 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.27763496144 0.287650121315 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192802056555 0.208842608468 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123393316195 0.135150697306 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57432391548 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 207.018472906 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.388174807198 0.469332199767 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.4910985939 52.1807786196 78% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 27.7857142857 23.2022227129 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2241204578 57.7814097925 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.214285714 141.986410481 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7857142857 23.2022227129 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.724660767414 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 55.5492104297 51.9672348444 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.58536585366 1.8405768891 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501598336407 0.441005458295 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.197693898446 0.135418324435 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0835381719834 0.0829849096947 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.665072767946 0.58762219726 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127510597074 0.147661913831 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.253088055495 0.193483328276 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720549390334 0.0970749176394 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.393964444181 0.42659136922 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0544983398025 0.0774707102158 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366929983303 0.312017818177 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453225547467 0.0698173142475 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.