The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
The letter received states that there was a study conducted at nearby Oceania university showing that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition fee for their own college-aged children. And requests Seatown University to institute same policy of free-tuition which would enhance morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
Author has substantiated its claim of this new policy implementation request with a study in nearby Seatown University. This would certainly enhance the retention rate and attract more professors to the Seatown University. However, author might have overseen other aspects which would also contribute towards higher retention rate. This would include better in-campus sports facility, gym, swimming and hostel accommodation for both faculty and students. Instead of monetary incentives, above mentioned facilities would contribute big time, ensuring enhanced morale among faculty.
Scholarship program will also help faculty to stay back at the job. Author did not mention it in his support. But scholarship will not only have monetary advantages but also in career and students profile. This will ensure that students also do their job of studying well to secure their career adding up competition and more zeal to their goals. Providing free-tuition to faculty children would be an injustice to non faculty students which might be discouraging to them. Hence, author would like to appease for annual bonus as an incentive. Faculty whose children are young also would be eager to join Seatown University.
I feel author has a good point of giving free-tuition as an incentive to the faculty. However, he must consider other aspects which might attract them to retain at the University. I have mentioned couple of ideas which might support my statement and author would like to have a glance to take a proper decision.
Overall, I agree with what author has stated. If giving free-tuition worked in Oceania University same will work in Seatown. In addition or substitution we might have other facilities which would further compel faculty of Oceania University to come and join Seatown University. Again this would make retention rate high.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 47, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l, I agree with what author has stated. If giving free-tuition worked in Oceania U...
^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...niversity same will work in Seatown. In addition or substitution we might have other fac...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'i feel', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.290322580645 0.25644967241 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.174731182796 0.15541462614 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0779569892473 0.0836205057962 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0430107526882 0.0520304965353 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0403225806452 0.0272364105082 148% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0806451612903 0.125424944231 64% => OK
Participles: 0.0456989247312 0.0416121511921 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75759216144 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0403225806452 0.026700313972 151% => OK
Particles: 0.00268817204301 0.001811407834 148% => OK
Determiners: 0.0564516129032 0.113004496875 50% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0564516129032 0.0255425247493 221% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0241935483871 0.0127820249294 189% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2207.0 2731.13054187 81% => OK
No of words: 343.0 446.07635468 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.43440233236 6.12365571057 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.425655976676 0.378187486979 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31778425656 0.287650121315 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215743440233 0.208842608468 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145772594752 0.135150697306 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75759216144 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 207.018472906 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.469332199767 113% => OK
Word variations: 56.6446876016 52.1807786196 109% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 16.3333333333 23.2022227129 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5481712906 57.7814097925 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.095238095 141.986410481 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 23.2022227129 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.724660767414 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 48.1117589893 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.61458333333 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413778165368 0.441005458295 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0889722266486 0.135418324435 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0639710979449 0.0829849096947 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.46602515607 0.58762219726 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141190663475 0.147661913831 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13792450756 0.193483328276 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12178617798 0.0970749176394 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291976441638 0.42659136922 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0420618529016 0.0774707102158 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287782401879 0.312017818177 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124327115545 0.0698173142475 178% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.33743842365 192% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 6.46551724138 217% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 14.657635468 130% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.