The following appeared in a newsloetter offering advice3 to investors:"Techroporation is our pick for investment this term. we urge all of our clients to invest in this new compaqny. For the first time in ten year ,a company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to complete with the current satellite provider. That company is Techorporation a consumer survey last year indicated that over eighty percent of respondents were dissatisfied with the current satellite television provider and would want to swotch to another provider if the industry were not a monopoly . Thus , the new venture of techcoropration into satellite television will priove to be highly profitable for those who invests now.''
The writer of this analytical piece has been drawn the optimistic conclusion from the investment of the money to start with the profitable margin to the customers and also give the some benefit of that highly profitable skims to the invest in the Tech corporation company .However the arguments fails to investments of the several possibility of the explanation for the apparent discrepancy.
First of all the argument of the first ten years in development of the setelite technology has been approved by the FTA to complete the with setelite provider are worst idea to the atracted to invester to invest to money in Techcorporation.
secondly, the argument fails with the consumer survey for last years to disssatisfied with current satellite televison provider to compain for some percentage value of define to attaracted to invester to invest the money for new company are better and affable with the people .
thirdly, the arguments are fails to get the veture of Techcorporation into setelite television will be perove to profitable invest to in company .That are not define the invester are to invest that type of the compnay and also not define the meaning full point to the give some specific reasone for the invetsment.
In conclusion , attract some valuable point with to invest the in company for better and profitable investment for the invester.some monopoly are can be use for atract to the invester.those ideas are worst and meaning less for to the invester to invest in that type of company .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...rgin to the customers and also give the some benefit of that highly profitable skims...
^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...efit of that highly profitable skims to the invest in the Tech corporation company .Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e invest in the Tech corporation company .However the arguments fails to investmen...
^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...invest in the Tech corporation company .However the arguments fails to investments of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...invest in the Tech corporation company .However the arguments fails to investments of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun possibility seems to be countable; consider using: 'several possibilities'.
Suggestion: several possibilities
...e arguments fails to investments of the several possibility of the explanation for the apparent dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the worst'.
Suggestion: are the worst
... to complete the with setelite provider are worst idea to the atracted to invester to inv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...to invest to money in Techcorporation. secondly, the argument fails with the consumer s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y are better and affable with the people . thirdly, the arguments are fails to ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thirdly
...e better and affable with the people . thirdly, the arguments are fails to get the v...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and affable with the people . thirdly, the arguments are fails to get the vetu...
^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple . thirdly, the arguments are fails to get the veture of Techcorporation int...
^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...erove to profitable invest to in company .That are not define the invester are to ...
^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...ove to profitable invest to in company .That are not define the invester are to inve...
^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'defined'.
Suggestion: defined
...able invest to in company .That are not define the invester are to invest that type of...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...asone for the invetsment. In conclusion , attract some valuable point with to inv...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...vester to invest in that type of company .
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'in conclusion', 'first of all', 'to start with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255813953488 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.151162790698 0.15541462614 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104651162791 0.0836205057962 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0271317829457 0.0520304965353 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0272364105082 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.143410852713 0.125424944231 114% => OK
Participles: 0.031007751938 0.0416121511921 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91942656114 2.79052419416 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0891472868217 0.026700313972 334% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.162790697674 0.113004496875 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0077519379845 0.0255425247493 30% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00387596899225 0.0127820249294 30% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1512.0 2731.13054187 55% => OK
No of words: 253.0 446.07635468 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97628458498 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347826086957 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268774703557 0.287650121315 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209486166008 0.208842608468 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126482213439 0.135150697306 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91942656114 2.79052419416 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 207.018472906 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.469332199767 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.4628515882 52.1807786196 76% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 20.039408867 25% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 50.6 23.2022227129 218% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1132076865 57.7814097925 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 302.4 141.986410481 213% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.6 23.2022227129 218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.4 0.724660767414 331% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 3.58251231527 475% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 77.4774703557 51.9672348444 149% => OK
Elegance: 2.41304347826 1.8405768891 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412328313433 0.441005458295 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.465988319394 0.135418324435 344% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0467217088607 0.0829849096947 56% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 1.0 0.58762219726 170% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 1.40433338743e-16 0.147661913831 0% => Sentences are similar to each other in a paragraph.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3156377371 0.193483328276 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328474738731 0.0970749176394 34% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.55957641826 0.42659136922 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0535919444246 0.0774707102158 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3156377371 0.312017818177 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328474738731 0.0698173142475 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.33743842365 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 14.657635468 34% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.