The following appeared as part of a column in a popular entertainment magazine. "The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it ? even though that amount is far more than any other person involved with the movie will make. After all, Robin has in the past been paid a similar amount to work in several films that were very financially successful."
The argument claims that the movie 3003 will maximize the profit of the producers if Robin Good stars in the movie. The magazine claims that paying several million dollars to Robin Good is worthy since he will make the movie successful as other movies he has participated in. However, the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The statement relies on unstated assumptions and unreliable logic. Hence, the argument is weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that the movie would be a great success if Robin Good acts in it, since the other movies where Robin has been in were very successful financially. The statement is problematic and not substantiated. There could be other more important factors that can influence financial success of movies, such as the budget of the movie manufacture, director of the movie, and economic environment for the movie market. Stated in the passage, it seems that Robin Good is the only factor that decide the succees of the movie. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that why the movie would be successful if Robin Good star in it.
Second, the argument claims that the producers of the movie 3003 should pay several millison dollars to Robin Good to cast Robin Good since he was paid a similar amount to work in the other successful movies. This is again a weak and unsupported claim as the statement does not state that whether Robin would do the similar job in the movie 3003. For instance, if Robin was paid several million dollars not only to act in other movies, but also to be enrolled in the overall process of movie production, it would be not reasonable to pay him similar amount of money to only act in a few scenes in the movie this time. The author of the passage should have provided more detail of the work of Robin Good in the movie to strengthen the claim of the argument.
In conclusion, the argument fails to explicitly illustrate neither why the movie 3003 would be successful financially if Robin Good acts in the movie, nor whether Robin is worth to be paid millions of dollars to star in it. If the argument answered to the questions raised in the above essay with specific examples, it could be much more convincing and persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unconvincing, and has several flaws. First, the argument readily assumes that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...successful if Robin Good star in it. Second, the argument claims that the pro...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trengthen the claim of the argument. In conclusion, the argument fails to exp...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244292237443 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.141552511416 0.15541462614 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100456621005 0.0836205057962 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.041095890411 0.0520304965353 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.027397260274 0.0272364105082 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132420091324 0.125424944231 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0296803652968 0.0416121511921 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53004202258 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0319634703196 0.026700313972 120% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12100456621 0.113004496875 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0319634703196 0.0255425247493 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013698630137 0.0127820249294 107% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2334.0 2731.13054187 85% => OK
No of words: 404.0 446.07635468 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77722772277 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.304455445545 0.378187486979 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230198019802 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148514851485 0.208842608468 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0940594059406 0.135150697306 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53004202258 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 207.018472906 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408415841584 0.469332199767 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.1525175159 52.1807786196 83% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 25.25 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7053965316 57.7814097925 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.875 141.986410481 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.724660767414 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 48.2698019802 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.9347826087 1.8405768891 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553440020927 0.441005458295 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.172520691235 0.135418324435 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0816625907616 0.0829849096947 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.653755114019 0.58762219726 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146505833776 0.147661913831 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28430834418 0.193483328276 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122811497661 0.0970749176394 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.644620177524 0.42659136922 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0111326120258 0.0774707102158 14% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.457727643098 0.312017818177 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585806094997 0.0698173142475 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 6.46551724138 155% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.