'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence would be needed in order to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
It is important for the viewers to have a good knowledge of local news as well as national news. A person should know what is going on around him and the country. But here if the television station increases the time of the national news for a year than it is not necessary that the local business companies stopped their program due to this. There can be many reason for this.
One of the main reason could be the television station may be out of news. So for this reason they could be showing a repetition of news. This could affect the TRP of the show. It is possible that they may be having some important news, but they were not able to present it in a manner one would like to see it. So due to the this decrease in TRP local business advertising companies might have thought that there is no point to advertise in the channel.
So there can be many possible reasons for the cancellation of the late night advertising. One of them could be, people generally late night would like to see some thing which is entertaining rather than discussion on some serious topics. Hence, the channels over attentions to the national news makes the viewer avoid viewing the channel.
However local news and weather news are important. But they too have to be represented in a good way that attracts the attention of the viewers. So a good combination of time management for the shows and good presentation of the show is important.
So just by restoring the time of local and weather news cannot avoid losing any further advertising revenues. It is just that people get bored watching some boring news all day. So for a change they might be complaining about the local and weather news but it is just that they want change. Late night no one would like to see news which they have been watching all day unless it is something important.
Hence by evaluating other possible consequences it cannot be guaranteed that by restoring the time devoted to weather and local news can attract the viewers and stop advertising companies from leaving.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...their program due to this. There can be many reason for this. One of the main reason coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...ner one would like to see it. So due to the this decrease in TRP local business advertis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
... generally late night would like to see some thing which is entertaining rather than discu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...day unless it is something important. Hence by evaluating other possible consequenc...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210796915167 0.25644967241 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.167095115681 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100257069409 0.0836205057962 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462724935733 0.0520304965353 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0488431876607 0.0272364105082 179% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.118251928021 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0488431876607 0.0416121511921 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5155655987 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0282776349614 0.026700313972 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.123393316195 0.113004496875 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0437017994859 0.0255425247493 171% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102827763496 0.0127820249294 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2035.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 364.0 446.07635468 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59065934066 6.12365571057 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.266483516484 0.378187486979 70% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.211538461538 0.287650121315 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151098901099 0.208842608468 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101648351648 0.135150697306 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5155655987 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 207.018472906 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434065934066 0.469332199767 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.5539783203 52.1807786196 85% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1637579458 57.7814097925 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 141.986410481 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.724660767414 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 39.3538461538 51.9672348444 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.44117647059 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508271939797 0.441005458295 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125383201583 0.135418324435 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0904829324474 0.0829849096947 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.553057570207 0.58762219726 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158580580383 0.147661913831 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206692916241 0.193483328276 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107004609962 0.0970749176394 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370359916616 0.42659136922 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0765864174236 0.0774707102158 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345459055125 0.312017818177 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604789796583 0.0698173142475 87% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.33743842365 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.