The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station
Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs.
The writer of this memo has suggested to restore the time slot for weather and local news in his channel based on weak and vague issues. He has also mentioned that most of the complaints received from the viewers were focused on local news coverage and weather report which clearly eliminates the assumption that viewers were uninterested in national news. Hence the idea of reducing the time slot for national news in unwelcoming.
In his statement, the manager has quoted that the local advertisers have just cancelled their contract, indicating that the advertisers were intact till recently with the channel. Thus it is highly unlikely that the advertisers dissolved their relationship with the channel because of the reduced time devotion to the local news as the speaker claims. Moreover, Arriving at a conclusion to a long term amendment based on a recent event is evidently showing the flustering attitude of the manager towards a problem.
The writer has also mentioned that more viewers can be attracted if the changes mentioned were accomplished. But, in the beginning of the passage, he has only mentioned about the number of complaints from the viewers and not about the quantity of the viewers. Thus, again it is highly uncertain to claim to gain more number of viewers by restoring the previous time pattern. Also the chances of losing good quality of viewers who watch national news, is beaming high.
To sum-up, the speaker's decision of changing the existing time schedule due to ignoble reasons is amorphous when the predictions he claims are concerned. Instead of restoring the former time slots the writer can consider extending the entire program time there by leaving more room for the advertisers and the viewers of both local and national news
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested restoring'.
Suggestion: suggested restoring
The writer of this memo has suggested to restore the time slot for weather and local new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ers were uninterested in national news. Hence the idea of reducing the time slot for ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... intact till recently with the channel. Thus it is highly unlikely that the advertis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...by restoring the previous time pattern. Also the chances of losing good quality of v...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244372990354 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.180064308682 0.15541462614 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0996784565916 0.0836205057962 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0514469453376 0.0520304965353 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0289389067524 0.0272364105082 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138263665595 0.125424944231 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0900321543408 0.0416121511921 216% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.63564945655 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225080385852 0.026700313972 84% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135048231511 0.113004496875 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0064308681672 0.0255425247493 25% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0096463022508 0.0127820249294 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1778.0 2731.13054187 65% => OK
No of words: 292.0 446.07635468 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08904109589 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.57801047555 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373287671233 0.378187486979 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321917808219 0.287650121315 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208904109589 0.208842608468 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123287671233 0.135150697306 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63564945655 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 207.018472906 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.469332199767 111% => OK
Word variations: 52.1464422211 52.1807786196 100% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 24.3333333333 23.2022227129 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4650957634 57.7814097925 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.166666667 141.986410481 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 23.2022227129 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 0.724660767414 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 56.5251141553 51.9672348444 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.81481481481 1.8405768891 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533080498892 0.441005458295 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153182457594 0.135418324435 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0844805588447 0.0829849096947 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.687517315468 0.58762219726 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.107087106689 0.147661913831 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283801309086 0.193483328276 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828917407345 0.0970749176394 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.499722238831 0.42659136922 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0470997647314 0.0774707102158 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.422743212631 0.312017818177 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410400869719 0.0698173142475 59% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.