many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. however,since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we can not permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
these argument have not be more sufficent to far this paseage and that conclationsis not proparly to the argument .cow flu routinely administered to all people in areas where the diseaseis detected.cow flu inoculationsto the people die as a result.
this paseage specific evidence to the cow flu were routinely and people die to these flu so we have not sufficent to the cow flu is more dangeras to the other and solve to these problem and efetively result .
cow flu is very dangerous to the people and it is not yet people de to this cow flu so we find the solusation to cow flu.cow flu is not very dangerous to the people because of small possibility peole is to die so cow flu is not to very harmful.so we have not inoculations against to the cow flu to be rotinely administered.
so we have conclation that cow flu is not to the dangeras to the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
these argument have not be more sufficent to ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
these argument have not be more sufficent to far this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
these argument have not be more sufficent to far this paseage and ...
^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nclationsis not proparly to the argument .cow flu routinely administered to all pe...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ationsto the people die as a result. this paseage specific evidence to the cow fl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this flu' or 'these flus'?
Suggestion: this flu; these flus
...ow flu were routinely and people die to these flu so we have not sufficent to the cow flu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...more dangeras to the other and solve to these problem and efetively result . cow flu is ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ve to these problem and efetively result . cow flu is very dangerous to the peo...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cow
...these problem and efetively result . cow flu is very dangerous to the people and...
^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dangerous to the people because of small possibility peole is to die so cow flu i...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...e cow flu to be rotinely administered. so we have conclation that cow flu is not ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'as to', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265432098765 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.15541462614 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0493827160494 0.0836205057962 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.135802469136 0.0520304965353 261% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0308641975309 0.0272364105082 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0493827160494 0.125424944231 39% => More prepositions wanted.
Participles: 0.0185185185185 0.0416121511921 45% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.80762493975 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.111111111111 0.026700313972 416% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12962962963 0.113004496875 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0255425247493 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00617283950617 0.0127820249294 48% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 862.0 2731.13054187 32% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 159.0 446.07635468 36% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4213836478 6.12365571057 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 4.57801047555 78% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.25786163522 0.378187486979 68% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.213836477987 0.287650121315 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163522012579 0.208842608468 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11320754717 0.135150697306 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80762493975 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Unique words: 66.0 207.018472906 32% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415094339623 0.469332199767 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 31.6893258196 52.1807786196 61% => OK
How many sentences: 4.0 20.039408867 20% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 39.75 23.2022227129 171% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.4494395828 57.7814097925 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 215.5 141.986410481 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.75 23.2022227129 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 3.58251231527 307% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 61.1336477987 51.9672348444 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.0 1.8405768891 54% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454888491136 0.441005458295 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.571868229166 0.135418324435 422% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0405110330864 0.0829849096947 49% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 1.0 0.58762219726 170% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 3.18887285829e-16 0.147661913831 0% => Sentences are similar to each other in a paragraph.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.345563332199 0.193483328276 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481735210306 0.0970749176394 50% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.642216662248 0.42659136922 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.03807653508 0.0774707102158 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345563332199 0.312017818177 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481735210306 0.0698173142475 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.33743842365 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 6.46551724138 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 3.0 14.657635468 20% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.