inoculations against cow flu are potentially lethal, however may save numerous lives. The argument that vies for routine inoculation is missing critical evidence and statistics in order to fully convince an audience that it is necessary.
First, statistics such as death rates, prevalence, and incidence of cow flu would greatly strengthen this argument if they show an obvious need for intervention. A high death rate would indicate that inoculation would save lives and a high prevalence and the number of potential lives saved would offset the possibility of a mortality by inoculation. Further...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Votes
Essay Categories
flaws:
No. of Words: 547 350 //Write the essay in 30 minutes. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 6
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 547 350
No. of Characters: 2802 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.836 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.122 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.999 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 204 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 170 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 128 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 90 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.88 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.372 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.76 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.562 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 7 5