The author has posed a case in which there have been complaints from viewers of the late night news program that local weather and regular news are not been telecasted and for this the late night news program has to again start telecasting these local news. There could be many other reasons apart from losing advertising revenues that the author has not captured, which could help the night news program telecast both the weather and local news again as before.
Firstly, the survey conducted does not give the accurate data of how many people view this channel late night for weather and local news. There could be a possiblility that very few percentage of people view weather forecast and are more interested in the local generic news. Also it is not known if the old age people are complaining about this or the working professionals too have the same complaint. If it is the old aged people complaining about the local news not being telecaste, they have sufficient time during the day to view local news.
Secondly, it could be possible that due to some severe weather conditions late night news program is not able to telecast local weather news due to bad connectivity. This issue of telecasting would last for few days. The news reporters must be paid low by the news program compared to the other program owners. Hence even after demanding higher wages, to maintain high profits the light night news program must have not increased the employees wages.
Lastly, the advertising agencies too must be charging higher for late night news program, forcing the program owner to pay high amount. This would be making it difficult for the program owner to pay high ending up with no advertisements and no public attraction to the channel.
To attract more viewers the program should telecast better quality local news and also should conduct a survey to understand the exact requirement of the viewers as to which news is to be covered during the night time. The above mentioned factors are also to be considered to provide better service to the viewers of the program.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eather and local news again as before. Firstly, the survey conducted does not g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'few percentages'.
Suggestion: few percentages
...There could be a possiblility that very few percentage of people view weather forecast and are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e interested in the local generic news. Also it is not known if the old age people a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...about this or the working professionals too have the same complaint. If it is the old ag...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime during the day to view local news. Secondly, it could be possible that due ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...m compared to the other program owners. Hence even after demanding higher wages, to m...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave not increased the employees wages. Lastly, the advertising agencies too mus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d no public attraction to the channel. To attract more viewers the program shou...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'lastly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'apart from', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257294429708 0.25644967241 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.167108753316 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.132625994695 0.0836205057962 159% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0610079575597 0.0520304965353 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0132625994695 0.0272364105082 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0742705570292 0.125424944231 59% => OK
Participles: 0.0610079575597 0.0416121511921 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41819184757 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0450928381963 0.026700313972 169% => OK
Particles: 0.0026525198939 0.001811407834 146% => OK
Determiners: 0.114058355438 0.113004496875 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0291777188329 0.0255425247493 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0159151193634 0.0127820249294 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2108.0 2731.13054187 77% => OK
No of words: 356.0 446.07635468 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92134831461 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.300561797753 0.378187486979 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.23595505618 0.287650121315 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.129213483146 0.208842608468 62% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0870786516854 0.135150697306 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41819184757 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 207.018472906 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449438202247 0.469332199767 96% => OK
Word variations: 46.031625692 52.1807786196 88% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 25.4285714286 23.2022227129 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1390413689 57.7814097925 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.571428571 141.986410481 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 23.2022227129 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.724660767414 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 49.0240770465 51.9672348444 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.62637362637 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502643792688 0.441005458295 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.210811042859 0.135418324435 156% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.130916722268 0.0829849096947 158% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.688476520039 0.58762219726 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180639953658 0.147661913831 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242162556565 0.193483328276 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105149223304 0.0970749176394 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422378538397 0.42659136922 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0327455491791 0.0774707102158 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350803871396 0.312017818177 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659593873288 0.0698173142475 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.