A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f

Essay topics:

A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The author of the argument purportedly highlights that a new seafood restaurant in the Bay City could be profitable due to the fact that majorities of people do not have time to cook and eat home-made foods. However, the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which some critical, yet ignored question need to be addressed.

To commence with, the author contends that according to a study seafood dishes are among delicious and nourishing food between people and have increased during past years. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since, a question that might arise is whether people are still interested in eating seafood and it is popular among them after many years. One point that should be considered is that the study could not be reliable and accurate owing to the fact that it does not show to the extent people really like seafood or even what kinds of seafood. In fact, there is possibility that the taste of people change during past years and a new seafood restaurant might face a terrible market. It is also important to say that perhaps vast majorities of people prefer to eat vegetable nowadays instead of seafood dishes.

The author also points out that there is no restaurant in the Bay City to offer barely seafood. Although it might seems tenable at face, it has some defects since you can always ask this question if seafood dishes only serve in seafood restaurants. One of the main, if not the only problem with the premise is that there are myriads of restaurants in every given city, which serve different kinds of food including seafood. Indeed, these restaurants might offer variety of foods and seafood in a way that could effects humans' taste greatly. Alongside that, the author does not mention to the extent people prefer to go seafood restaurants per day. As a matter of fact, there is possibility that people prefer to experience various foods and restaurants in the city.

Finally, as set forth by the author many families because of their career and not enough time, do not cook home-made foods rather than they did in past years. Nevertheless, the rationale behind this premise could be challenged owing to an unsettled question if the situation were identical a decade ago for families. One point that can't go unnoticed is that many situations such as economic prosperity will change rapidly during ten years. Indeed, there is possibility that families are coerce to be two-income family nowadays because of economic recession. This situation make it hard to prepare home-cooked food every day.

Having scrutinized the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are a number of question, having been ignored by the author while the answer of which could add to the logic of each premise.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...f foods and seafood in a way that could effects humans taste greatly. Alongside that, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...decade ago for families. One point that cant go unnoticed is that many situations su...
^^^^
Line 7, column 488, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'coerced'.
Suggestion: coerced
... there is possibility that families are coerce to be two-income family nowadays becaus...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, while, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 2260.96107784 103% => OK
No of words: 476.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89915966387 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52668478591 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474789915966 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5975916766 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240929649391 0.218282227539 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078709756303 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710085412223 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122631158173 0.128457276422 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932951471398 0.0628817314937 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.