A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal receive little to no professional dental care, while people in suburban areas in the United States see a dentist an average of 1.25 times per year. Thus, regular dental care is not helpful in preventing tooth decay.
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
The argument states that in a recent study of children in Nepal and the suburban areas of United States,the children of Nepal have lower tooth decay then than the United States children despite of the fact that Nepal children receive little to no dental care. Hence according to the author dental care is not useful in preventing tooth decay. However the authors argument has many fallacies which he has not accounted. There are many assumptions made by the author which can't be relied upon. These fallacies are been stated in the following paragraph.
The author in the argument states that Himalayan region in Nepal receive little to no dental care. This is just a vapid assumption with no considerable grounds. This might be possible that the children of Nepal are getting regular professional dental care and hence the tooth decay in children is lower. Hence this assumption of the author is unjustified and we cannot reckon it.
There might be a possibility that the study which is been done is not pertinent. Might be only few children have been studied in Nepal and in Unites States, all the suburban areas of US are not studied. Hence proper statistical data is not been provided to be considered. Hence the argument is completely unjustified.
Additionally it is stated that the people in suburban area in the United States see a dentist an average of 1.25 times per year, but no specific data and statistics is been provided for the children seeing the dentist every year in US. It might be possible that children in US are not going for regular dental care hence they have higher level of tooth decay as compared to the children of Nepal.Hence this argument is unjustified.
At last I would like to say that, more pertinent and statistical data need to provided in order to prove the argument valid. More germane assumptions need to be provided which can be relied upon. Hence the above argument provided by the author is completely unjustified and discarded considering the above fallacies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... and the suburban areas of United States,the children of Nepal have lower tooth deca...
^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ldren receive little to no dental care. Hence according to the author dental care is ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s not useful in preventing tooth decay. However the authors argument has many fallacies...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... in preventing tooth decay. However the authors argument has many fallacies which he ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ny assumptions made by the author which cant be relied upon. These fallacies are bee...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eceive little to no dental care. This is just a vapid assumption with no consider...
^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e the tooth decay in children is lower. Hence this assumption of the author is unjust...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... assumption of the author is unjustified and we cannot reckon it. There might ...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is been done is not pertinent. Might be only few children have been studied in N...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e suburban areas of US are not studied. Hence proper statistical data is not been pro...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... is not been provided to be considered. Hence the argument is completely unjustified....
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... argument is completely unjustified. Additionally it is stated that the people in suburba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...ay as compared to the children of Nepal.Hence this argument is unjustified. At las...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ay as compared to the children of Nepal.Hence this argument is unjustified. At las...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and statistical data need to provided in order to prove the argument valid. Mo...
^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o be provided which can be relied upon. Hence the above argument provided by the aut...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... upon. Hence the above argument provided by the author is completely unjustified ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252054794521 0.25644967241 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.191780821918 0.15541462614 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109589041096 0.0836205057962 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0438356164384 0.0520304965353 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0191780821918 0.0272364105082 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120547945205 0.125424944231 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0712328767123 0.0416121511921 171% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60752463719 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246575342466 0.026700313972 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.117808219178 0.113004496875 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164383561644 0.0255425247493 64% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0109589041096 0.0127820249294 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2015.0 2731.13054187 74% => OK
No of words: 341.0 446.07635468 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90909090909 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33431085044 0.378187486979 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.228739002933 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187683284457 0.208842608468 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0967741935484 0.135150697306 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60752463719 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 207.018472906 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425219941349 0.469332199767 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.6213208958 52.1807786196 82% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.039408867 90% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9444444444 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9583188557 57.7814097925 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.944444444 141.986410481 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9444444444 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.277777777778 0.724660767414 38% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 3.58251231527 475% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 41.8183447377 51.9672348444 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.74193548387 1.8405768891 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493367776738 0.441005458295 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127970282823 0.135418324435 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0590475277551 0.0829849096947 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.548195376357 0.58762219726 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144476373955 0.147661913831 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194221400353 0.193483328276 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170328477035 0.0970749176394 175% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425954992827 0.42659136922 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.110941881468 0.0774707102158 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347510214632 0.312017818177 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129473523729 0.0698173142475 185% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.82512315271 166% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 9.0 5.36822660099 168% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.