Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Law, by definition, is that which the regulations that keep the peace and prosperous of a society. Proponent of the view that law need to be more flexible, believe that law need to consider different circumstances, times and places. However, a more flexible law,to large extent, will mean that the criminals have the possibilities to get away with the punishments and sentences. After weighting the evidence, it is certain that laws need to be rigid and redoubtable to the criminals.
Consider the example of the legimitations in Suviet Union, which used to be considered as a lawless country. The government announced that the people in power were , on the basis of security, more flexible when they were in chareged with any crimes. Consequentky,many party's leaders were not chareged with corruption when they received prodigious amnout of wealth in varuous ilegal ways. The entire authorities was in debauchery and was overthrown by its people. It showed that the flexible of laws led to the dissolution of a society and its people.
The government creat laws to keep its civilians' safety and prosperities. The flexible laws enhances criminals' opportunities to threaten other's safety and properties, which will unstablize the development of a society, particularly when no one feels sense of safety. More importantly, if such a policy were to be implemented,the people in power would intend to apply the policy when they broke the laws. Both of the cases mentioned above would, to a large extent, casue the disorder of a society.
Furthermore, decideing when and how to be flexible to the criminals is diffcult. Different judges would have different judgements on the basis of the flexiable laws, particularly, it easier to casue plunderations when the cases are more complicated.
In final analysis, it is clear that such a statement cannot be followed. To consider the various of circumstances, times and places for the laws, more emphasis need to be on the whether it is against the credo of legimiation other than casually demanding of the flexiable.
Sentence: The entire authorities was in debauchery and was overthrown by its people.
Description: The fragment The entire authorities is not usually followed by was
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace was with were
Sentence: The government creat laws to keep its civilians' safety and prosperities.
Description: A noun, singular, common is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to government and creat
Sentence: The flexible laws enhances criminals' opportunities to threaten other's safety and properties, which will unstablize the development of a society, particularly when no one feels sense of safety.
Description: The fragment laws enhances criminals is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace enhances with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Sentence: The government announced that the people in power were , on the basis of security, more flexible when they were in chareged with any crimes.
Error: chareged Suggestion: charged
Sentence: Consequentky,many party's leaders were not chareged with corruption when they received prodigious amnout of wealth in varuous ilegal ways.
Error: amnout Suggestion: amount
Error: ilegal Suggestion: illegal
Error: varuous Suggestion: various
Error: chareged Suggestion: charged
Sentence: The government creat laws to keep its civilians' safety and prosperities.
Error: creat Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Both of the cases mentioned above would, to a large extent, casue the disorder of a society.
Error: casue Suggestion: cause
Sentence: Furthermore, decideing when and how to be flexible to the criminals is diffcult.
Error: decideing Suggestion: deciding
Error: diffcult Suggestion: difficult
Sentence: Different judges would have different judgements on the basis of the flexiable laws, particularly, it easier to casue plunderations when the cases are more complicated.
Error: casue Suggestion: cause
Error: flexiable Suggestion: flexible
Sentence: To consider the various of circumstances, times and places for the laws, more emphasis need to be on the whether it is against the credo of legimiation other than casually demanding of the flexiable.
Error: legimiation Suggestion: ?
Error: flexiable Suggestion: flexible
Error: credo Suggestion: red
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 14 2
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 14 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 338 350
No. of Characters: 1679 1500
No. of Different Words: 161 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.288 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.967 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.919 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.882 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.057 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.176 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.565 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5