In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement

Essay topics:

In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The argument ascertaining that strong influence is required to make a significant contribution is impromptu when we walk past with history keeping alongside with our rational thinking. There were several contributions made by many who were influenced but some significant contributions which serve humanity might outweigh in several aspects. Certain influence of past may result on prejudiced notion or flummoxed views which may not achieve significant contributions as claimed. Much of the world we live marked away from the horse-and-buggy generation is ramifications of people who challenged the past notion and antithetical to the accepted 'right' which supposed to influence them in order to be significant.

To illustrate, Galileo though a strong catholic with his beliefs, he challenged and proposed helio-centric theory which postulated against the accepted system of earth being center and all planets revolving around it. Has he been influenced and accepted the established order by the prevalent, he would have been benighted to his own thought process which was radical enough to raise new school of thought and marking a progress, years later, without which we would be living in a world which still proclaimed that earth being center. Such strong influnces might develop myopic thought process which would hamper the contribution that can be considered as significant.

Though some influence can be cogent to seed the rational thought process, it may become complacent in its own world. Have Elon Musk, Chief of Tesla which makes revolutionary cars, been influenced with the three century old thought process of internal combustion engines and automobiles, he would be making just another car; though he accepted that commutation is primary freedom and meant be for betterment of the humanity, it need not come at a cost. He went on being rebel by influencing the masses and eventually the tried-and-tested-and-dropped automakers by making the impossible as possible with electric cars, which was considered alien for the complacent automakers of the past; this marked a significant era in automobile industry. He radically revolutionized the cars we drive, and at times they drive, today for us. Such cross pollination of ideas and thought process is made by someone who have never been influenced or into automobiles but went on marking a significant change in automobile industry.

Some may still argue that significant achievement are made by the one who have been influenced within, say, significant computer programs alike VB been evolved by the influence of C programming of Dennis Ritche - it need to be. Though what Dennis created was considered as fundamental and landmark in computer programming, but much of another landmark of contributions made by Python into computing has never followed or influenced by its significant previous influencer, C programming. You may disagree and say that Nelson Mandela fought decades for inequality being influenced to the racial inequality moments and went on to achieving as first president of south africa, but George Washington went on uniting the radical race broken disparate America with Jefferson under the title of United States of America without any influence of the past on inequality which marked a significant progress in inequality without any influence of the past.

Significant contributions continue to happen irrespective of the influence of the past in their own world. Much of world is made and progressed by the rebels who went on un-accepting the accepted or called as 'achieved' of the past.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[10]
Message: The singular proper name Elon must be used with 'has'.
Suggestion: Has
...may become complacent in its own world. Have Elon Musk, Chief of Tesla which makes r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 874, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant progress'.
Suggestion: significant progress
... of the past on inequality which marked a significant progress in inequality without any influence of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3025.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 560.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40178571429 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17684867841 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 929.7 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.5448770443 60.3974514979 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.941176471 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9411764706 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76470588235 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312599143775 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107697636382 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577760279184 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181140022745 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05397738108 0.0667264976115 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 14.1392134831 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.