In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field
Humanity for huge progresses need previous experiences and it can help them to reach success earlier than is possible. Using previous experiences is the main human characteristic but in some fildes there is not any previous experience. So that in these cases only creativity can help scientists.
For instance, in aerospace technology and knowledge that has a fifty years historical background, there is no previous technology. So that, just creativity help the scientists to be successful. In theses cases individuals who have more perception from their around environment are more successful and less divagation than other who just rely on previous experiences. Always previous experiences is not beneficial and effective rather than it can hurt to human creativity who are seeking for promotions.
I'm partially agree that any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. In history prestigious and prominent people used previous accomplishments to success like English physicist and mathematician Issac newton so previous experiences help him to examine new ways and reach to his aim earlier.
Ancestors experiences can ensure us that our attitudes are right or wrong and make a good motivation for promoting. For instance before experiences are useful in some cases, when there is not any lights or candles, firing wood can help us to have light. Some experiences are made by personal experiences with out of any scientists interference so theses experiences help people to guide themselves.
Also using previous experiences help scientists to do new ways and don't examine previous failure ways so their time will save and they reach to their aims earlier than they think. Previous achievements
Sometimes using previous experiences are detrimental because they are in controversy with traditions and didn't let scientist to promote like Galileo. The persecution of the Italian astronomer and physicist for proving the Earth moves around the Sun so catholic church condemned Galileo. Nevertheless, using previous experiences can not help for promoting scientists.
in summary, in some sciences, there is no previous experiences and these help scientists to give new theories and new theories help the science to promote more and more and world face to new discoveries.
Even in medical sciences, about some diseases there is not any previous experiences and force scientists to think deeply and examine new ways for giving new theories and do more researches in laboratory for arriving to the acme of science.
so it can be concluded that, with out of any previous experiences can be successful and creativity in any field has a key role for promote.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s there is not any previous experience. So that in these cases only creativity can help...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...tivity who are seeking for promotions. Im partially agree that any field of endea...
^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...iences are made by personal experiences with out of any scientists interference so these...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...by personal experiences with out of any scientists interference so theses experiences help...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ences help people to guide themselves. Also using previous experiences help scienti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nces help scientists to do new ways and dont examine previous failure ways so their ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than they think. Previous achievements Sometimes using previous experiences are...
^^^
Line 6, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... are in controversy with traditions and didnt let scientist to promote like Galileo. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...can not help for promoting scientists. in summary, in some sciences, there is no ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...y for arriving to the acme of science. so it can be concluded that, with out of a...
^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
... science. so it can be concluded that, with out of any previous experiences can be succ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, in summary, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38248847926 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05989742378 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472350230415 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7553785168 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.947368421 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140376910674 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657485254805 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192691305321 0.0758088955206 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842380016988 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147110709097 0.0667264976115 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.