The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
Any society which holds hard work, leadership and patience creates win win situation for both the constitution and the citizens. While the question about competition or cooperation among people is complex to determine. Since sportive competition brings good society and leaders to manage it, on the other hand democracy has always led with consensus among people who belong to it. So what determines the most of it? if competition brings active involvement, on the other hand cooperation brings involvement as a group and decision to be made in a group. As mentioned earlier leadership and patience in a system develops an organisation with cooperation while hard work brings individual contribution in form of active competition. However the differences are numerous and each one has its own flaw.
In a government or industry competition among people in form projects and assignments who finishes the best of its kind is encouraged through awards and other similar activities. Individual contribution towards the team increases and each find their own responsibility in acting towards the situation. A person who has encountered a bad experience with certain task skirts it next time. Though a novice who enters in the situation fell for the same trap, yet some might even cross the barrier. Is that mean the person who crossed in the first go considered to be a winner and he can take the leadership and the other person who dropped is not capable of taking over. Definitely not! People who develop certain perspective fails to see the active contribution given by each individual, competition in these forms should criticise the individual with a single incident. Even the current leader who own the team failed to do so, the same person who fell got experienced with the failure and he can handle the situation much better the next time if given a chance. Thus competitions which grows like these, could make a system salubrious, young people in an organ should be embraced with such situations, so this is absolutely neccesary.
Industries with groups and teams which engages in project work has a team with people organising the task and distributing it among people who does better in certain field and the leader finds out each and every task done by an individual and also identifies talented groups which can finish with much cooperation then an individual doing it. Weekly meetings and project meetings showcase these ideas and everyone concurs with the group about project. Thus a projects success depends upon the unanimous agreement among people in a team. None of the projects so far went on successful without teams cooperations and agreement. For instance, a company which has started a project forms a group and everyone comes up with the building blocks to form the structure, each ideas bolsters the structure once its agreed and comprehended among the team. Thus cooperation leads into functional development in the society, in form it is an inevitable component.
While two key factors play one over the other, but a huge flaw in the system is group ideas and behaviour. Recent studies, shows us that a group which involves in certain action can influence an individuals decision. This has been proved to be correct, were an individual who is in a team agrees with the team leader or a novice agrees with a senior or even friend agrees with another friend them. These concurrences can lead to chaos in the team. Such activities can cause deleterious effects in the organisation. Thus new methodologies has been created to address these issues like individual thoughts and everyone thinks about the ideas and present their views to the team. Each of them defends for their thoughts and make sure the team comes with a better decision finally.
We can find active contribution in form of competition as well as cooperation in the team. To conclude team which has cooperation and competition are integrated components which contributes immensely in the system, without one another the system is not fulfilled and cannot grow healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...d work, leadership and patience creates win win situation for both the constitution and...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... it. So what determines the most of it? if competition brings active involvement, ...
^^
Line 1, column 732, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ribution in form of active competition. However the differences are numerous and each o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1062, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...better the next time if given a chance. Thus competitions which grows like these, co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e concurs with the group about project. Thus a projects success depends upon the una...
^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...rs with the group about project. Thus a projects success depends upon the unanimous agre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 846, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...agreed and comprehended among the team. Thus cooperation leads into functional devel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 516, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eleterious effects in the organisation. Thus new methodologies has been created to a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 38.0 12.9106741573 294% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3397.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 669.0 442.535393258 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07772795217 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08576781939 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82527107057 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45889387145 0.4932671777 93% => OK
syllable_count: 1045.8 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7834929411 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.233333333 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140737990359 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407058134339 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440732148093 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855059667543 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514655359734 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.