The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Young people have visions, enthusiastic passion, young age, bravery, and encounter any challenge. Whether it is wrong or not, young people pursue their work. Different jobs, different circumstances give young people another challenge since there is no limits in their goal. They confront difficult times such as lacking money, various adversities. In order to come up with having a leadership in society, therefore, young people should have more competition than cooperation.
To begin with, young people are callow to understand any difficulties or hardship, they fortify themselves by having competition, and eventually practice affords next level of their limits. That robust mind doesn’t come along to young people easily; they fail their expectancies and grow up with failure, and come up with stronger solution to avoid any problems. For example, sports are one of the toughest challenge and competition over other players. Messi, soccer player, is not the person who is innate to play a ball easily. He is impassioned with practicing skills, strategies, etc. all of these practices bestow his goal to be stronger skills than other soccer players.
Secondly, young people acquire their leadership by having stalwart heart; if they are too much cursory in their field, then it couldn’t be able to work hard. Finally, they probably lose by themselves. Thus, society should give the theme that young people can’t have success without their passion. Even in business field, they are passionate with winning over other competitor of company; indeed, society should give a clue that if young people don’t embed their leadership of competition, then their lives wouldn’t survive in the society.
Lastly, the sense of competition in leadership should expect of real life. Real life doesn’t give any idea, but it does tease apart young people’s survive. If young people have cooperation for preparation of society, they couldn’t start first, which shows young people only follow people, who already invent something in their field. For that reason, they wouldn’t survive in society. Therefore, they must have at least one of the best independent work, which can be irreplaceable position. This step shows better imprint for society to be prepared.
Conclusively, although cooperation would give better impression than competition, young people, nevertheless, should better to have competition because of three reasons above. People in the any type of field in society only consider any young people who are very competitive, not the people who are willing to cooperate as preparation of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no limits'?
Suggestion: there are no limits
...ve young people another challenge since there is no limits in their goal. They confront difficult ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53201970443 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86624590283 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539408866995 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.1719240336 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.652173913 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.652173913 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251752666008 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777530020585 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544788868107 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155181832494 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389862265645 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.