The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Whether the best way of teaching is by praising positive and ignoring negative actions is a questionable issue. Undoubtedly, by praising positive actions anyone can be energised to give their best in their respective field. However, teacher should not whitewash a student mistakes in that way a teacher is making a mistake in not pointing out his/her mistakes. This way teacher is not giving an opportunity to rectify himself. Thus, I disagree with the opinion that, the best way of teaching is only by praising positive actions, and argue that a student must know his negative actions.
Firstly by casting the student’s negative actions the student can grow to a better human being. Life does not end with schooling it starts with schooling , so a teacher should explain his negatives in order to change him. For example: If a student is only given positive feedback of his or her actions then then the student will be unaware of what is right and what is wrong and in this case he might do something wrong which he should not. Consequently it is pretty obvious that the best way of teaching is not by praising the positive actions.
Furthermore, the teacher should acknowledge the students mistakes and make him rectify by himself rather just pointing it out. For example: If a student was explained what is wrong in a clear manner then our world would have been saved from the hitler and other terrorists. Both our common sense and personal experience told us that, it is the duty of the teacher to point out the negatives of the student and nurture him to a better individual. The above mentioned examples demonstrate that teacher should not ignore the negative actions of the student.
Some might argue that by pointing out the negative action of the student he might get forlorn, disheartened and will not show interest in pursuing new this. This might be true in some aspects, but not in all cases. However, the above argument does not provide sufficient support to the claim that the best way of teaching is to praise the positive actions and ignore negative ones.
In conclusion, the best way of teaching is not only by praising the positive actions although, student might get disturbed if he was pointed out only the negative ones, but there is a high possibility of turning the student into a better individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... with schooling it starts with schooling , so a teacher should explain his negativ...
^^
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: then
...positive feedback of his or her actions then then the student will be unaware of what is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 447, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...do something wrong which he should not. Consequently it is pretty obvious that the best way ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a clear manner" with adverb for "clear"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...f a student was explained what is wrong in a clear manner then our world would have been saved fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udent he might get forlorn, disheartened and will not show interest in pursuing n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.885 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62286055981 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6164026288 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.941176471 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439041918237 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183417580428 0.0831039109588 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.204715923488 0.0758088955206 270% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295585657614 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134069980755 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.