The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Teaching anyone moral principles and values with the help of instances of positive and negative actions is a very compelling recommendation and should be followed as any positive action definitely deserves appreciation and approbation but to ignore the negative actions is a bit misleading. Ignoring something can never bring out best denouements. As it is said ignorance is a bliss but not in this case.

Be it a child or an octogenarian, a regular employee or a celebrity, everybody in this world strives to achieve success in whatever fields they belong to and on succeeding with the help of their persistent and diligent efforts they look for admiration and praise which they truly deserve. Praising a positive action helps individuals to get encouraged and to boost their morale. When the actions taken are judged by others people actually come to know whether their actions are positive or not. In case of a child, the mother teaches the values of life by admiring the things done positively by the child and by castigating for the wrong doing.

Positive actions, if are judged correctly and by righteous people, they help in building the character and providing perfect guidelines for the future but if negative actions are ignored then people tend to assume that their actions are wrong according to the society. When Lance Armstrong, a venerated sportsperson was accused of taking performance enhancement drugs all his accolades and medals were retracted. This helped in making other sportsperson understand that his actions were unfair and anyone who would do such a thing would face the same fate, if the actions would just have been ignored instead of taking an action against them would it have taught such a lesson.

Even if it is considered that ignoring negative things would not be a concern but it would lead to chaos and burgeoning of criminals and negative elements of the society. For the betterment of the world it is necessary to punish the ones who are involved in notorious activities. Remaining silent and idle can never be a solution for anything. Raising voices can only bring the much needed change in the world.

In the end, I think appraising positive actions is surely a way of teaching but rather than ignoring negative actions, consequences of actions and ways to correct them should be taught which will lead to a better world.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'out the best'.
Suggestion: out the best
...ing. Ignoring something can never bring out best denouements. As it is said ignorance is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eded change in the world. In the end, I think appraising positive actions is s...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'i think']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216666666667 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.209523809524 0.157235817809 133% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0761904761905 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0428571428571 0.0497285424764 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0452380952381 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109523809524 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0857142857143 0.0406280797675 211% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.75069789217 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0285714285714 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00238095238095 0.0016655270985 143% => OK
Determiners: 0.102380952381 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0285714285714 0.0249443105267 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0166666666667 0.0148568991511 112% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2376.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 396.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386363636364 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277777777778 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204545454545 0.200843997647 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118686868687 0.132149295362 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75069789217 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517676767677 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 57.278102533 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 26.4 23.380412469 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.5739835854 59.4972553346 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.4 141.124799967 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.380412469 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.466666666667 0.674092028746 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 54.1777777778 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.384 1.64882698954 84% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464111256384 0.391690518653 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102002543621 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0777182342956 0.077325440228 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.54613602781 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.206543781165 0.149214159877 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184485976321 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991268189511 0.0892212321368 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.318735260924 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0440264188699 0.0692045440612 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314163997569 0.275328986314 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476185622248 0.0653680567796 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.