The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching by accolading positive actions, might be a good idea, but to condone negative ones is dangerous. Because a good response on positive actions might encourage one to perform more of those ignoring the bad actions might result in precarious development of cognition. There are several circumstances when it is required to confront negative actions to teach important lessons.
To begin with, imagine a child in kindergarden, who gets appreciated by a teacher for sharing his lunch or helping out other classmates during activities, this child will for sure learn that a behaviour of harmony is indeed required. Therefore, it is a good way to teach by first assigning children the task and then appreciatong them for any level of accomplishment they can achieve.
Moreover, it is also important to give no reaction on failure, while children are developing their skills. Admonishing them or forcing them to perform better might break them, or make them hate the task. For example, when I was in school, being a slow learner, had received a lot of negative comments from teachers, that made me feel like incapable and incompetent, moreover I began to aloof from the class, only to later realise that it was none of my fault and I could do as good as others, only I needed to concentrate and practise more.
Additionally, a consistent criticsm demotivates, it is common in adults as well, then no doubt that young learner will de-motivated when criticised at every step. A constant presence of fear of not succeding clouds one's judgments and enthusiasm. For instance, if a child good in badminton is consitently chastised over his innane mistakes by his parents or coach, it will not be possible for him to recognise important instructions, he might confuse useful advice with regular criticism.
However, It is not good to ignore all the bad actions while one is in stage of learning. They might come to take it as if doing bad things was ok. If a child involves in, bullieng or learns to steal he should be admonished and tought that whatever he was doing was wrong for certain reasons.
Conclusively, it is indeed a good way to teach one by appreciating them for what ever they are capable of achieving, but ignoring every action might result in deleterious learnings. Therefore a sound judgment should be made while exercising such practice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to condone negative ones is dangerous. Because a good response on positive actions mig...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...resence of fear of not succeding clouds ones judgments and enthusiasm. For instance,...
^^^^
Line 12, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... might result in deleterious learnings. Therefore a sound judgment should be made while e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97474747475 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90219968013 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573232323232 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.818347238 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.125 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126029147903 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044422930647 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403050998704 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699498572172 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473561244872 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.