The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

We always want to focus on the good and ignore the bad, in almost all scenarios of life. Though it makes sense, we have to learn from the past and how to better ourselves in the future. That is why we have to teach our future generations why and how actions are good or bad. Every individual learns differently and therefore, teaching should not be generalized to be best suited for everyone.

Of course, we want to praise positive actions because this will condition the person to continue to their behavior. It is unjustly to focus on just the positive and ignore negative behaviors. Without confronting the poor actions, the person will not truly understand what they are doing wrong and limit their judgement. The person will assume there is nothing wrong with that type of act and may continue to perform the act in the future. Teaching requires some sort of repercussions for unfavorable behaviors. There are better outcomes if teachers and guiders help the student understand the reasons behind their negative actions. Ignoring a matter does not make it go away; it is best to confront and help the person comprehend how their behavior was unfavorable or damaging.

To focus only on the positive aspects of behavior is limiting a person’s understanding of their actions. By relying on favorable ones, these individuals will only seek and focus on what will bring them success or praise. They will not understand the results of failure or hardships or be able to comprehend the poor behavior of others. Individuals, who have been taught through positive actions, will find it difficult to adjust when things don’t go according to plan. In order to promote growth and well-roundedness, we have to commend students for good actions and acknowledge their bad ones as well.

Though it is best to individualized teaching to each student’s personality, some may learn better if the focus is on their best behavior and actions. Some, who have lower self-esteem, will feel distraught if there is any light shined on their negative choices. They may learn to adapt themselves to forgo the bad actions and only perform what is good and will pave the road to success.

Not all people are alike and we cannot assume everyone should be taught the same way. In order to promote well-thought out actions and empathy, teachings need to acknowledge both positive and negative actions.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...dent's personality, some may learn better if the focus is on their best behavior ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dge both positive and negative actions.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, well, of course, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99251870324 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77767204121 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476309226933 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5463430298 60.3974514979 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12537741515 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444831257748 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363807640022 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782211589675 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254115538227 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.