Leaders are essential for a development of any organization, corporation or country. The given prompt argue that for the smooth functioning of any corporation, organization, even for a nation, a leader should be superseded in five years. I agree that to develop the country and to preclude formation of tyranny, change is required in a high post of any corporation or country in every 5 years, but it is not mandatory, instead, a chance for competing should be given for a previous leader.
Consider a case; if the corporation or country is ruled by single personnel for long duration such as entire life time, there is a chance of changing such personnel into a despot. Further, such incumbent person inclines to be corrupt, favors nepotism, and also, quells insurgence in an appalling manner. However, if the one is allowed to leave their post after a certain period of time, it frustrates chance that leads to such heinous events. Further, such policy gives an opportunity to a new competent person, who is brim with innovative ideas and willing to approach numerous new policies for development, which are different from the earlier.
However, it does it mean that after a certain period, such position, if there are not any competent or competent are limited, should be replaced by an incompetent personnel, who can further deteriorate organization status. Instead, voting system policy should be implemented to decide whether the present leader should be replaced or allowed further in that position. We can see, for instance, that many democratic countries have applied such policy. Many voters evaluate the events that have occurred during the regime of the incumbent person, and decide if it is auspicious to continue with such leader or to give chance to any other interested person and also the leaders, wanting to be leader after a period of his current regime, focus fully on development plans. There are copious example of the countries where the presidents who have done well during their tenure time are repeatedly elected whereas who have nothing but bad are replaced from the position.
Regarding the five year period, many argue that it is suitable timeframe to allow a chance for change in the position. Voters can assess change done by any leader after the five years one has been elected. Further, being 5 years a suitable duration, many countries have their election time period of 5 years and also, policy maker basically focuses on the 5 years development project.
In conclusion, due to above mention reasons, for advancement of any organization or country, policy for change of leader in every five years is required so that the citizen or employee can decide whether to continue with previous leader or change him. Therefore, such policy, I believe, should be implemented by all democratic countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...sonnel for long duration such as entire life time, there is a chance of changing such per...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appalling manner" with adverb for "appalling"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s nepotism, and also, quells insurgence in an appalling manner. However, if the one is allowed to leav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...wed to leave their post after a certain period of time, it frustrates chance that leads to suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut bad are replaced from the position. Regarding the five year period, many arg...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08779443255 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77024076818 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458244111349 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5345865778 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.764705882 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4705882353 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14154685889 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594918189099 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494043862085 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947318307131 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048074861823 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.