Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
The claim stated by author is a polemical topic. The statement says, role models and heroes should be examined so as to get an idea about the character of a society. The reason given in its favor states that such actors and public figures usually depicts the society’s highest or peak ideas. I, to some degree, actually agree with the aforementioned claim as a hero is always a person who is assumed to carry a decorum and social ideals that makes him a role model.
In support, as all know, the Bollywood is full of variegated personalities. But in spite of several actors, the ideals that Mr. Amitabh Bachchan carry, are considered as epitome of society. Many common people and other actors contemplate those values as their life’s role models. Because of this, if those social behaviors are looked into, we can assume that that examination is actually depicting the summit of society values. Not even male actors, likewise, one of the most beautiful woman in the world, Mrs. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, also exemplifies the peak ideals of society. Her behavior, communication, etc. all are considered as the most sophisticated and urbane way of expression, because of which, she is always seen and followed by many people in not only India but also in other countries.
Also, it is natural that in whatever way an actor or actress behave, they are always on media. They are well aware that any reaction of their, is actually seen by millions of people on their television sets. As a repercussion of which, they always show their highest ideals while interacting not only with media, but also with their fans. Thus, studying their reactions, we can get an idea about the character of a society.
Although, one can argue that what about the actors that do not carry their ideals with them and always giving bad exemplary to people. To this, a point should be kept in mind that the examination of ideals or study of character should not be done on every other actor. Some public figures are not carrying their highest values and thus can be seen as a threat or the lowest of values. For example, some years back Mr. Sanjay Dutt was excused of keeping illegal guns, in this case, this gives an example of bad values of society and hence, should not be examined.
To conclude, it depends on which actor you are researching. To get the idea of highest values of a society, one must consider a public role model carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...le models and heroes should be examined so as to get an idea about the character of a so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... idea about the character of a society. The reason given in its favor states that s...
^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the most beautiful woman in the world, Mrs. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, also exempl...
^^^
Line 6, column 76, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...or you are researching. To get the idea of highest values of a society, one must consider ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consider a public role model carefully.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'likewise', 'look', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235537190083 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.132231404959 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0723140495868 0.0880659088768 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0661157024793 0.0497285424764 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0454545454545 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138429752066 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0454545454545 0.0406280797675 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56759138628 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0144628099174 0.030933414821 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.099173553719 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0185950413223 0.0249443105267 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0165289256198 0.0148568991511 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2436.0 2732.02544248 89% => OK
No of words: 423.0 452.878318584 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75886524823 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347517730496 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.210401891253 0.280924506359 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.13475177305 0.200843997647 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0898345153664 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56759138628 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498817966903 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 55.5496714871 55.4138127331 100% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1428571429 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1190405539 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 41.1830462682 51.4728631049 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.72033898305 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502134071617 0.391690518653 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0977869884256 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0607264789106 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.512489315517 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139998556636 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182060903718 0.161403998019 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110516145179 0.0892212321368 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31906433726 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.051771337321 0.0692045440612 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330265167649 0.275328986314 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147180729392 0.0653680567796 225% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.