Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author of the issue claim that people will not take women and men as hero into consideration as soon as possible. He further reasons that the fame of people will reduce as exposure to media's careful examination. Personally, I refute the rationale behind both the claim and reason. In the ensuing paragraphs some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that every given society is known with its heroes, which in some case influence vast majorities of people dramatically. Indeed, men and women as hero play a dominant role in all around the globe. Broadly speaking, myriads of people are inclined toward the opinion that they should not do something wrong and would make a precise plan and a sound decision in order to ensure their future life. As a matter of fact, heroes in the societies could provide fertile ground for people to reach pinnacle of their life. Indeed, how they lived and how they behaved guarantee people's progress and prevent them to do something wrong. For example, Cyrus, king of Persia is the symbol of peace, knowledge, different strategies and so forth, which spreading out its costumes and rules in society can guarantee success of people in long run if people put them as first priority. To elucidate more on this issue, heroes in every society could bring many advantages and provide an opportunity for a country to make a progress day in day out.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that nowadays people are more responsible toward their works and acts. Considering these people as heroes in the societies could expand responsibility and reliability to the extent that trustworthy and integrity will be the bright hallmarks of future generations. As far as I am concerned, with trust and integrity you will have nothing to fear since you will have nothing to hide and also with trust and integrity you will do the right thing so, you will have no guilt. As a corollary, current people as hero could spread out nothing more than trustworthy and integrity in future generation.
As far as the reason is concerned, it should be pointed out that having scrutinized whole hallmarks of people through media can add to their reputation vigorously or in some case introduce them as a superhero in near future. To delve further into the issue, media are able to not only advertise but also patronize people and expand their fame extensively. Arguably, everything will spread out in the spur of the moment through media and well-known people could be introduce to others in the blank of an eye. So, media scrutiny can provide an opportunity for famous people to be known among society and future generations take them as hero into account.
Having discussed both the claim and the reason, I reiterate that current people have this potential to be considered as hero for next generations owing to the fact that we can still find some people with specific characteristics that with the help of media they have this chance to add to their reputation and become well-known in order to convert to a hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...and integrity in future generation. As far as the reason is concerned, it shou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, well, broadly speaking, for example, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2599.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8945386064 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64100911715 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463276836158 0.4932671777 94% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.166759026 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.95 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.55 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21502663388 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068091667721 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395799426617 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128574000832 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299303276267 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.