Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim that no men or women can be regarded as a living legend by the society because once they are under the media their reputation diminishes seems extreme.
Unfortunately, we live in a world where facts are misconstrued and the information is presented in a cryptic form to the common public open to interpretation rather than straight simple truth.
While that may be true, one should not forget that media was responsible for creating awareness among people about various protests and events, uniting them and becoming their voice. The rise of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and Nelson Mandela happened because media decided to help them disseminate their message in every nook and corner of the country.
It did what a single Man cannot achieve independently. Media has constantly given a helping hand to great leaders for their propagandas.
Let us take the example of the Osama Bin Laden's assassination. Even though the President of the United States were to address the people about the news, various network channels across America worked hard to telecast it only for the joy of giving the news to people a minute sooner. This made all those men who were involved in the operation great heroes. Without Media, great stories of War, bravery, bloodshed would have never seen the light of the day.
Aun Sang Su Kyi of Myanmar is a living hero who fought bravely even under house arrest because the media was ready to publish her story make it alive. This has inspired millions of people who decided to join her struggle later.
The great Indian freedom struggle led by Mahathma Gandhi got immense support from newspaper dailies during the 1920s and 30s which awakened the entire nation and made a common man from Gujarat the father of the nation. In the present day scenario, while there are many cases of media shaming high profile people publicly, there equally or more number of incidents where a common man helping the society is made a hero. For instance, the recent floods incident in a city called Chennai in the southern part of India discovered great heroes who volunteered and helped the public with their difficulties. Stories of such humanitarian services were covered by Indian media which inspired millions of youth in the country.
Media is an unbiased entity and it's sole purpose is to provide information to public about the current affairs. History has proven to us that the voice of a common man can overthrow a dynasty in a single day which was possible because of media. It has always been a right hand to the public helping them and supporting them in their arduous endeavors.
In this contemporary world, we see a lot of celebrities and other leaders who are ruthlessly scrutinized by media and are publicly humiliated. There is no denial that many of such incidents were done for the sole purpose of tarnishing someone’s reputation but there are also incidents were such harsh scrutiny revealed bigger truths and brought justice. One should always remember that there are many more incidents where it served as a good friend for the public and uplifted many movements and societies and ultimately helped in the progress of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y helped in the progress of the nation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2662.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95716945996 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55303391452 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7268304858 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4090909091 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95454545455 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180954081916 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049857752758 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399491182874 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793842573778 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443855562723 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.