Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Major policy decisions compartmentalize into national economy, security, economy, diplomatic committee. These types of issues are fundamentally important to the any nations. If one of politic decision fractured other policy, then there always have deleterious effect. Therefore, major policy decision should be made by politician and other government experts.
First of all, Politician and other government experts are literally “expert”. They are by no mean just businessman, scientists. They originally have studied specific field such as political science, economics, etc. When there is recession, politicians or government experts who are in the major of economy will try to solve the problem. For instance, recent issue of the world is about unemployment rate is increasing and they are trying to find best fit for decreasing the rate. In Europe, what they did is to make transparent society; indeed they discard venality and not indulge of either private or public company. In order to help the low-income family, Swiss give a financial aid about $300 per month, which helps to provide more efficiency of mercenary circulation in local market, and it eventually help national economy.
Secondly, government experts or politicians are people who have more responsibility for major policy. Politicians knows how the specific point and statistics as society come up with problem. They would know much more than normal people, and they pretty much working hard because of their supporters as well. This will affect more judicious and pertinent judgment on the major policy.
In conclusion, politicians and government experts, because, are experts in their field and have more responsibility than general public, they should have more laudable judgment on decision making. Refutation can have reason that general public can make better decision because they know what they need. However, the fact is that people in general mostly don’t know exactly how national major policy affect other policy. Therefore, better major policy decision surely made from politician.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...tion in local market, and it eventually help national economy. Secondly, governm...
^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... of their supporters as well. This will affect more judicious and pertinent judgment on the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...field and have more responsibility than general public, they should have more laudable judgmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...making. Refutation can have reason that general public can make better decision because they k...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61392405063 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91192895441 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6123878886 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3684210526 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404079733764 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128837608481 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12872132082 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266853056529 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105685533718 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.