College and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The vision of the policy is to make all faculty should make a time to work outside the academic world which correlates with the courses they teach. College and university can broaden out the spectrum of the field that they possess since all faculty member will bring the new methodology and technology. Especially in science, most company and government are willing to make very best possible innovative ideas that will engender another level of future society. Faculty member would notice the social aspects of outside the academic world and this prospective will surely helpful for the academia to inform their students. Take for instance, industry of related to biology is now even making new teeth by having Alzheimer’s genes whereas the academic study is only showing that Alzheimer’s disease is bad. Faculty member should know the aspect of the recent vision of society so that they could be more beneficial to themselves to learning more and teaching more. Eventually, college and university will have more aims to help and support the policy about requirement of all faculty member learning the outside the academic world.
On the other hand, there is some dissident about this policy because faculty member should know and better to teach the fundamental value in the classroom. All faculty members from college and university are mostly master degree or Doctor of philosophy in the specific field. They know perfectly about the study that they teach and students follows the work of professors or faculty members. The way of teaching the course should be enough in their knowledge that they have. However, the main reason to have this policy is not about how much does faculty member know about the course they teach, it is about how much faculty member impassioned about what they teach. Even though professor knows material perfectly, he or she should not stop learning. Therefore, this should be valuable policy.
In closing, the policy from college and university is very reasonable stance because all faculty member would increase value of teaching method, apply a new methodology in their courses, and it will be beneficial to the students that faculty have and finally, this policy is about how much faculty member is passionate about the courses they teach. Therefore, the policy should be remained as a requirement for all faculty member.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...on to have this policy is not about how much does faculty member know about the cour...
^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'does'' or 'doe's'?
Suggestion: does'; doe's
... have this policy is not about how much does faculty member know about the course th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15544041451 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54061481078 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458549222798 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4904833416 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380157488486 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149557813634 0.0831039109588 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103026613651 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282535561822 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047375427344 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.