College and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Essay topics:

College and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

The vision of the policy is to make all faculty should make a time to work outside the academic world which correlates with the courses they teach. This policy is reasonable because of three reason: college and university can have more wide range of courses, faculty member learning new material is helpful to the students in the courses and finally, this requirement of policy will help the reputation of the college or university.

First of all, college and university can broaden out the spectrum of the field that they possess since all faculty member will bring the new methodology and technology. Especially in science, most company and government are willing to make very best possible innovative ideas that will engender another level of future society. Faculty member would notice the social aspects of outside the academic world and this prospective will surely helpful for the academia to inform their students. Take for instance, industry of related to biology is now even making new teeth by having Alzheimer’s genes whereas the academic study is only showing that Alzheimer’s disease is bad.

Furthermore, faculty member should know the aspect of the recent vision of society so that they could be more beneficial to themselves to learning more and teaching more. Eventually, college and university will have more aims to help and support the policy about requirement of all faculty member learning the outside the academic world.

Moreover, Faculty member learning new material is not only helpful for themselves but also for their college and university reputation. If this policy is available in the university and college, then current students in the courses in this university will tout about how valuable this university is and the vision that they have. This circumstance will make better reputation of the university and college ever since they started this type of policy.

On the other hand, there is some dissident about this policy because faculty member should know and better to teach the fundamental value in the classroom. All faculty members from college and university are mostly master degree or Doctor of philosophy in the specific field. They know perfectly about the study that they teach and students follows the work of professors or faculty members. The way of teaching the course should be enough in their knowledge that they have. However, the main reason to have this policy is not about how much does faculty member know about the course they teach, it is about how much faculty member impassioned about what they teach. Even though professor knows material perfectly, he or she should not stop learning. Therefore, this should be valuable policy.

In closing, the policy from college and university is very reasonable stance because all faculty member would increase value of teaching method, apply a new methodology in their courses, and it will be beneficial to the students that faculty have and finally, this policy is about how much faculty member is passionate about the courses they teach. Therefore, the policy should be remained as a requirement for all faculty member.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eputation of the college or university. First of all, college and university can...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 538, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...on to have this policy is not about how much does faculty member know about the cour...
^^^^
Line 9, column 543, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'does'' or 'doe's'?
Suggestion: does'; doe's
... have this policy is not about how much does faculty member know about the course th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, of course, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20275590551 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59241953902 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393700787402 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7816162392 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.15 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365314904578 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142785013123 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09405907906 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236773013141 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683630893865 0.0667264976115 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.