Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion about somebody else’s work, but it is the opinion of the judgement or the expert in that field that holds any value. In todays world this is more true, as experts’ opinions on cinema, books and restaurants are valued in newspapers and magazines.
Experts have a thorough knowledge about their field that is necessary for sound judgement. A novice in a field may offer his opinions, and sometimes even have a new perspective of looking at things, but we need an expert to verify his claims. Only an expert can determine if the views of the novice are relevant in that field. In addition, it is always easy to criticise, but to base this criticism on non trivial points requires an expert. The expert, having an in depth knowledge about his field, can answer the questions about his critique. He is more capable of providing a nuanced approach that could serve a guide to the people working in his field. In a profession like scientific research, it is hard to imagine a case where experts’ judgement is not valued or takes a second precedence to other criticism.
Some believe that experts can be blamed for being biased in their judgement. However, this is not true. In fact, in some of the fields like culinary arts, experts are expected to judge without any bias. Everybody has a preference for a taste in their food depending on the culture they grew up in. Some people prefer spicy where as others prefer bland; some prefer sweet where as others have a sour palate. Such difference make us biased in our judgement of a dish. On the other hand, a connoisseur of food, having knowledge about different dishes all around the world, can appreciate the dish better. They provide a judgement without any bias. Moreover, as their opinions are taken seriously and even published, they cannot afford to be partial. Sometimes, like in the case of Poe, their criticism is more famous than the books that he has criticised.
Thus, criticism of any work should be taken, if at all, only from the expert capable of providing sound reasons for judgement. Because their judgement is being valued and being published, they are not biased in their opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... However, this is not true. In fact, in some of the fields like culinary arts, experts are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ey grew up in. Some people prefer spicy where as others prefer bland; some prefer sweet ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... others prefer bland; some prefer sweet where as others have a sour palate. Such differe...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221967963387 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.160183066362 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0755148741419 0.0880659088768 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0389016018307 0.0497285424764 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0572082379863 0.0444667217837 129% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.135011441648 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0549199084668 0.0406280797675 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60581599663 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0205949656751 0.030933414821 67% => OK
Particles: 0.00228832951945 0.0016655270985 137% => OK
Determiners: 0.116704805492 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0183066361556 0.0249443105267 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114416475973 0.0148568991511 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2202.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 380.0 452.878318584 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79473684211 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344736842105 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.234210526316 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165789473684 0.200843997647 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131578947368 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60581599663 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 53.055595471 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0952380952 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7510093819 59.4972553346 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 141.124799967 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0952380952 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.674092028746 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 41.5162907268 51.4728631049 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.60714285714 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378012918161 0.391690518653 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0690095043554 0.123202303941 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0545050205181 0.077325440228 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.432377772503 0.547984918172 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143075230514 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138377651093 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820334544209 0.0892212321368 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.385659893565 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.043852470964 0.0692045440612 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2704748443 0.275328986314 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769026182005 0.0653680567796 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.