"Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field."
The statement contends that the critical judgement of any work in any field is perfect if it is done by the person who is expert in that field but it is imperfect or of less value if it is done by any random person. I agree with this statement to some extent.
As per the statement the judgement of any work should be done by expert of that field only . This statement is basically true as for judging any kind of work the deep knowledge about the work is crucial. For example if any experiment is carried out in the laboratory and for judging the outcome of it, it is necessary to have the deep knowledge about that experiment because any wrong judgement can lead to great disasters. In the above case if the judgement is carried out by any person having superficial knowledge about that experiment than it can lead to wrong judgement which can be sometimes dangerous. Another example is if the exam papers of any subject are to be checked then they are needed to be checked by the expert in that particular subject only because if it is checked by any random person than it would lead to imperfect grading of the marks which can lead to serious problems.
On the other side, if in case it is required to judge very normal basic thing than it can be also be done by the person having little knowledge in that field because if any expert is called upon for judging such small things than it would be economically costly or sometimes the experts would also not be willing to judge such kind of small things. For example if it is required to do any normal inspection of the object where greater perfection is not required in any field than the person with superficial knowledge can also give the better judgement and it would also be economical in that case as compared to if any expert is called upon for judging such kind of things.
In conclusion the type of the person to be called for judgement like expert or person with superficial knowledge in that field depends upon the amount of perfection required in judgement for that particular thing. Hence before deciding whether the expert is required in judging any paricular thing, the degree of perfection required in judgement should be taken into account and also how much cost would be added to the final cost of the product for calling expert for judging the object should also be consider.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ree with this statement to some extent. As per the statement the judgement of any ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uld be done by expert of that field only . This statement is basically true as for...
^^
Line 2, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rks which can lead to serious problems. On the other side, if in case it is requ...
^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...in judgement for that particular thing. Hence before deciding whether the expert is ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing. Hence before deciding whether the expert is required in judging any paricu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54009433962 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44186552997 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.339622641509 0.4932671777 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.6369312707 60.3974514979 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5454545455 23.4991977007 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151704466465 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872060006372 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754193677362 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127293391518 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063138649034 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.1639044944 79% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.