Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Judgement of any work is the main thing that describes the value of that subject. The issue statement says that any judgment has no value until and unless it is done by the person who is expert in that particular field. However, i do not completely adhere to this view point as under certain conditions this statement fails. The reasons for my opinion are, only experts have that knowledge and cognizent power to understand that particular thing, some subtle things can be noticed by a common man, in certain cases both expertancy and common perception are required. My reasons are delineated with examples as follows;
Firstly, as by acquiescing with the statement judgement done by experts only is more value able rather than given by any layman. As there are very obscure distinctions and points that only expert can understand but no one else can find out that. For instance consider the case of plant breeding, the appearance of any different trait in certain crop can only be noticed by that specific breeder, common man cannot distinguish that until the change is major. Distinction in crop trait approved by scientific breeder will always be readily accepted than given by any common person with little knowledge. Thus judgment done by the expert will always be more value able.
Secondly, in certain cases it is not necessary that any thing scrutinised by common person will always have no value. Under some circumstances an amateur can prudent any thing cannot be even noticed by the expert. For example sometimes a household wives has more beneficial methods to cure any disease than medical science.
Last but not least, judgment done by an expert and a layman are significant in their own way. Though the value of judgment given by an expert is more because we have a mindset that any expert cannot be wrong, but he too is a human. There are the chances that error can might be occur in expert's judgement. Therefore we should never delimit the judgment of a common person because sometimes experience matters more than knowledge. As take the case of any person who is taking a medicine from a long time has the more knowledge about its effects rather than a pharmacist.
To sum up, i restate that value of judgment given by an expert will be more value able but we cannot underestimate a layman's judgement. To prove this statement reasons about the affect of judgement by an expert and a common person were explained with explained with examples like of plant breeder, a person taking medicine from a long time. Thus one cannot reject the judgment of a common person by saying that judgment of expert has more value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pert in that particular field. However, i do not completely adhere to this view p...
^
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oticed by a common man, in certain cases both expertancy and common perception ar...
^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as follows; Firstly, as by acquiescing with the statement judgement done by exp...
^^
Line 2, column 604, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ny common person with little knowledge. Thus judgment done by the expert will always...
^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... certain cases it is not necessary that any thing scrutinised by common person will alway...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...me circumstances an amateur can prudent any thing cannot be even noticed by the expert. F...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...an might be occur in experts judgement. Therefore we should never delimit the judgment of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...experience matters more than knowledge. As take the case of any person who is taki...
^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s rather than a pharmacist. To sum up, i restate that value of judgment given by...
^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alue of judgment given by an expert will be more value able but we cannot underes...
^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'explained with'.
Suggestion: explained with
...t by an expert and a common person were explained with explained with examples like of plant breeder, a perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...erson taking medicine from a long time. Thus one cannot reject the judgment of a com...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81456953642 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52637988143 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426048565121 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0819921444 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.05 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2729664134 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972987900033 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782199685699 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163520547295 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424573400808 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.