Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In asserting that the educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing the fields of study the may not be prone to succeed, the speaker fails to acknowledge other diverse issues – fields of study that students might feel inclined toward or have the pertinent talent for it- besides the fields of study concerned with job and vocation. Nevertheless, I agree with the statement only to the extent that it is concerned with career and job-related issues, in other cases, as will be elucidated below, it will not be so.
Due to the ambiguous nature of the phrase “succeed”, I will assume that it means job satisfaction and career choosing decisions. Admittedly, when aiming for a successful career and proper job, students are better off leaving the decisions to the veterans. Take for instance the students in Iran, who choose the field of their study at the age of 15 in high school. Their teachers are their guide for directing them to the right path that is prosperous for a future job. As a result, it is of paramount importance that such decisions are left to people with more experience, which could bring student a lifetime of job satisfaction and welfare.
With these examples, it could be argued that “dissuading students from pursuing a field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed” is valid, but when viewed holistically, it is not because succeeding in a field of study can have multiple definitions. To elaborate on, succession could mean intellectual awareness and knowledge of that certain field of study. If so, I disagree with the statement because as long as a students have the tendency and inclination to pursue a specific field of study, nothing is ought to impede him/her. For example, imagine a student with a talent in music to the extent that he spends a plethora of times behind his musical. It should be taken into account the fact that such passion, no matter what the odds are against the student for not satisfying his math teachers, or even not meeting the job market qualifications for a high salary job, paves the way for his future success in his related field of study, music. Notwithstanding, people might undermine this assumption by saying that such thinking only applies to prodigies, virtuosos, and gifted people. However, just like I earlier said, I will maintain my stand that the statement is only applicable to career and vocation-related subjects.
In conclusion, contrary to the statement above, I agree to the statement only to the extent that it is related to profession and career choosing. Other issues, like being a gifted student, are undermined by the speaker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etime of job satisfaction and welfare. With these examples, it could be argued ...
^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...e with the statement because as long as a students have the tendency and inclination to pu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247035573123 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.142292490119 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0770750988142 0.0880659088768 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0335968379447 0.0497285424764 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0494071146245 0.0444667217837 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142292490119 0.12292977631 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0406280797675 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99616806221 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0375494071146 0.030933414821 121% => OK
Particles: 0.00197628458498 0.0016655270985 119% => OK
Determiners: 0.0928853754941 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0256916996047 0.0249443105267 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0138339920949 0.0148568991511 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2682.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 447.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364653243848 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.259507829978 0.280924506359 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203579418345 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131991051454 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99616806221 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.206850125 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 27.9375 23.380412469 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0645028496 59.4972553346 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.625 141.124799967 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9375 23.380412469 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 53.8882829978 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.92105263158 1.64882698954 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438210724873 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153001287239 0.123202303941 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0791159189571 0.077325440228 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.539638022809 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15344054437 0.149214159877 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180674093313 0.161403998019 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946636309251 0.0892212321368 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481791865387 0.385218514788 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0523210234275 0.0692045440612 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332531861757 0.275328986314 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411726525418 0.0653680567796 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.