Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
An Education institution is a place where a student has learns, burnish, broaden his horizon in particular field of study and makes yourself as capable so that he can fight in the competitive world. A student have passionate, confident, assiduous and have dreams to achieve goals by best direction. But in my opinion, when you decide to go for higher studies, the pathway should correct. In case that, a person going to the best direction then definitely he will achieve his goal. As we all know, god gives different skills to everyone, only a person should know his abilities.
The educational institutes should do counseling with the students. Like in schools, some students will assign a teacher. The teacher has a responsibility to observe the performance and activities to these students. She will maintain the records and then identify the records when student reach 10th standard. With the help of this record, an instructor gives suggestion whether he should go for this course of study or other. Suppose a student have the incredible voice but not excellent in studies then the student should go for singing and become a singer in her life. Lata Mangeshkar is a marvelous singer for Hindi songs which originated from India. If she chose her career in sports, then she does not become famous as like today. In contrast, if student chooses a field of course with counseling as well as himself then he will not feel under pressure and love his work.
Self-interest and passion is the important key to achieving a victory. If we observe in our history, there are many great personalities which made a success in the particular field. Sachin Tendulkar is the highest scorer batsman in cricket. He was a great batman that represented from India. Some of his records still did not break yet. Suppose he pursued his career with singing or became a scientist instead of sports then definitely he did not become what he is now.
If you flip the other side of the coin, we dissuade the students for one particular field, it might not be the best decision for their career. For example, one should brilliant in English language and the counselor says you must go for lecturer. But a student is fond of talking and good management skill. Whether he should go for a lecturer or Management in human resource. The answer is, one should go for human resource. As a result, along with counseling, one should know his own skills and do what makes him happier towards work or life.
In the nutshell, the educational institutions dissuade the students in their fields of study on the basis of performance, throughout their study but student also have the responsibility to take his decision with sincerity. He should identify what his abilities to do in particular field of study and what makes him happier in his work, not under pressure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ght in the competitive world. A student have passionate, confident, assiduous and ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, well, for example, in contrast, in particular, of course, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85979381443 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70194680309 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482474226804 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5111029915 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1785714286 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3214285714 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186065511388 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495047691006 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515985148634 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110957006084 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438716508801 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.