Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is an integral part of a person's life. The institutes providing them education also play a very pivotal role in their lives. They are duly respected in every society. But they are also human after all and they can't predict the future, so I would disagree that they should dissuade students from the field of study which they think will not be a right choice for the student.
The reason is simple which is, time travel is not been proven. Yes! this is the only way to know the future outcomes. People like Walt Disney, Albert Einstein, Steven Spielberg who have achieved so much in their respective field were discarded by such institutions that they would not be successful. But their contribution to their respective field was so huge that they are considered legends of their fields.
This interference is an attack on the freedom of a student . Education provides the direction in which a person want to go. People always do better on things which they choose to do compared to what they are made to do. Yes, they might not be so good at first, but the love for their choice gives them drive to do it persistently till the desired result is not achieved. There is lack of drive in the other scenario.
The institutes must advice them, but the final call should be of student's. They should help them not dictate them. The human race is capable of doing so much that nobody can even imagine. We should not judge a person's future by some predefined parameters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
Education is an integral part of a persons life. The institutes providing them edu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... they are also human after all and they cant predict the future, so I would disagree...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s, time travel is not been proven. Yes! this is the only way to know the future outc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isney, Albert Einstein, Steven Spielberg who have achieved so much in their respe...
^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...is an attack on the freedom of a student . Education provides the direction in whi...
^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
... other scenario. The institutes must advice them, but the final call should be of s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...y can even imagine. We should not judge a persons future by some predefined parameters. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 262.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65648854962 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41496057565 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.21412735 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7647058824 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4117647059 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05882352941 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189949957883 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545884830302 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602889480216 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117531913591 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715426246505 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 14.1392134831 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.