Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
When it comes to the issue the beast ways of learning, some people suggest that studying what teacher want to teach in the next class in the best way for learning. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight, because students can learn easy and more.
The first reason is that is that when students study contents of books lets them to better learn. Indeed, they have some backgrounds about the subjects, so they can better catch the matters. Moreover, this method allows them to have critical thinking and ask more questions, which help them to better learn. Also, they have more time to discuss with teachers and become familiar with several aspects of the topic.
A further point we must consider is that teacher can teach more and use various methods. As we all know, the time of a class in limited and teacher have to teach many things in the short time. Sometimes, they have to eliminate some trifle subjects and focus more on important subjects. In addition, the limited time does not allow them to use diversity of methods for teaching, which makes the class attractive. Therefore, if students have backgrounds of the matters, they can learn so fast that teachers gain more time. For example, if the teacher of biology has more time in a class, he could take students to the nature and allows them to experience which they learn in the class in reality.
In contrast, opponents believe that this approach can not be useful in all academic areas. In the some specialized courses like mathematics or chemistry, student may spend a lot of time for studying them, while they do not understand it. In fact, it can affect their motivations negatively. In other words, they will give up before going to the war.
All above evidence supports this fact that educator should teach maters after student have studied about them, because students can learn more and better. Of course, as an English proverb goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who have the opposite view partially reasonable that this approach can be usefulness in some courses, which is difficult as self studying. Nevertheless, its benefits outweigh dangerous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'is that'.
Suggestion: is that
...earn easy and more. The first reason is that is that when students study contents of books l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...be useful in all academic areas. In the some specialized courses like mathematics or...
^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... them, while they do not understand it. In fact, it can affect their motivations n...
^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an affect their motivations negatively. In other words, they will give up before g...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'of course', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207459207459 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.151515151515 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0979020979021 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.04662004662 0.0497285424764 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0559440559441 0.0444667217837 126% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.121212121212 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.013986013986 0.0406280797675 34% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.44952457972 2.79330140395 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027972027972 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.002331002331 0.0016655270985 140% => OK
Determiners: 0.0955710955711 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030303030303 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018648018648 0.0148568991511 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2214.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 375.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.904 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322666666667 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178666666667 0.200843997647 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0933333333333 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44952457972 2.79330140395 88% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541333333333 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 60.153366394 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.75 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0432014848 59.4972553346 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.674092028746 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 44.35 51.4728631049 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.34862385321 1.64882698954 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194954972095 0.391690518653 50% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0765205053798 0.123202303941 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0557801334142 0.077325440228 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.506690004643 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143087835478 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765245281269 0.161403998019 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445475542294 0.0892212321368 50% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.320917786487 0.385218514788 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.095711684506 0.0692045440612 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131018002278 0.275328986314 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432726328293 0.0653680567796 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.