Government funding for pure science endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to
direct more funding towards humanitarian science projects.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to consider specific instances for which this statement
may or may not be true.
Appropriation of funding has always been debatable creating controversy about which is most essential for use of grants. In wide spectrum of opinion, a section of society believe that national authorities should deduce budget for pure science and allocate this portion towards humanitarian science for the benefit of human kind. I strongly aver in favor of notion that government shall focus more spending its funding for humanitarian science.
To commence with, in developing country, such as India, a copious portion of country income is directly spent for research purpose in pure science organization. ISRO, Indian space and research organization, which uses billions of rupees every year for various space project in various work also their scientists not only take huge salaries but also focuses on work which in not directly in benefit of public. For instance, rocket science is a deep subject requires vast knowledge as well as superior understanding, now imagine a scientist, who makes rocket now make a public transport energy efficient bus or railway that is eco-friendly and gives lavish comfort, so that every citizen wants to travel through rather than privet mode of transportation. Such work is directly in sake of public and overall catapult the growth of nation on an unimaginable rate. Moreover, in cost of one space rocket, hundreds of public transit can be produced. This, hence, can be said that such wise use of resources can be fruitful for county, as a whole.
Secondly, there are many issues in this modern epoch, like many deadly disease, pollution, and likewise, which can be cure by instigating and patronizing by extravagant prize and awards as honor to scientist. As a result, well-being of people will enhance abundantly. As there is a huge scope in medical science more allocation of money shall be done by national corporation. Such step can be miracle for those who are playing with life and death. Henceforth, many available issue in many counties can be resolved by wise decision.
However, this not case for every country, developed country plays vast role in space research, NASA can be the best epitome for this context. Such organization must perpetual their work it aids the entire planet to solve and understand life of other species out in other galaxies as it may be advantageous for future generation to fight against any hazardous. If no work is done on pure science than human mind would be bounded by lack of knowledge.
In conclusion, funding shall be distributed based on necessary rather than in human race among various countries. Proper use of resource can take us to the better life. Also, at some extent, some work by economical sound nation shall continue their work for betterment of man-kind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eing of people will enhance abundantly. As there is a huge scope in medical scienc...
^^
Line 13, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eration to fight against any hazardous. If no work is done on pure science than hu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13938053097 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76479637401 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579646017699 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6612866198 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.15 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245841502079 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074866331339 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458469836444 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141072739712 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669413035222 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.