Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are preserved and generated
Culture traditions, physical and non-physical, are the cherished heritage of both major cities and their nation, the ongoing, distinctive signatures of their individuality, exhibiting their unique fascination which acts as an extremely important economic resources in modern times. For this reason, it is necessary for government to offer funds to preserve these ancient, powerful, profound assets, which, in turn, thrive these cities, especially in and after their maturity.
National culture traditions, indeed, are preserved and generated in major cities, but this is not always the case, because some of them are being destroyed by urbanization and globalization. Moreover, as is known, folk arts emerges and remains alive in rural areas, a number of historic buildings are also kept perfect in small towns, all of which constitutes national cultural heritage.
Traditional culture in major cities like antiquities, relics tells about their history to attract people at home and abroad to visit, study them each year, as an important resource in tourism and in archaeology. Located in Beijing, Forbidden City, one of the most complete and perfect architectures in the world, experiences the vicissitudes of dynasties and survives from wars, keeping thousands of various antiques, which really tells people the Chinese history about its structure, design, far-reaching cultural connotation, and the like. Another example is St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, the entire interior of which is richly ornamented with marble pillars full of various patterns, reliefs covered with graphic figures, exquisite sculptures, and gilding, symbols of the sublime of the beautiful and the mystery of religion, and the exterior of which is St. Peter's Piazza with obelisk the prominent landmark known as witness. All of them are extremely valuable in cities' tourism resource. Aren't they worthy of governments' support either of policy or of fund?
Non-physical traditional culture like music, film, colored drawings brings cities about fame and business, such as Fashion City(Paris, France), Music City(Vienna Austria), Film Festival City(Cannes France), Porcelain Town(Jingdezhen, China). Cannes International Film Festival annually attracts a large number of filmmakers, directors, actors, businessmen all around the world to exhibit, exchange, and sell their works, which directly raises the popularity of Cannes in the globe and manufactures commercial opportunities. Furthermore, various kinds of activities concerning cultural traditions in major cities should be regularly organized, such as lectures on local conventions, family traditions, values ancestors admire, in this way that the spirit of these cities has been handed down to its people, guiding the mode of their thought and behavior. Shouldn't the governments financially support such activities to be held?
Change is crucial for culture traditions in the context of globalization in order to meet people's diverse needs. Major cities in a nation usually are big melting pots, in which people have different values, customs, beliefs, religions, and so on. First, diet culture is the characteristic. In Shanghai, southern people eat rice while northern people have noodles, Americans like drinking coffee while Chinese prefer tea, and now these foods have been incorporating the lifestyle of local people, and more cuisines can be supplied in restaurants to cater for people' taste. Second, Lingua Franca and local language are mixed to widely use, convenient for people to communicate and be engaged in business activities. In addition, importantly, innovation is very crucial for traditional culture in modern times. For instance, Errenzhuan added with eastern and western elements, has been rooted in such urban areas as Changchun, Shenyang, Harbin, now disseminating the country and the world by media and commercial performance, and increasing these cities' wealth for its future progress.
In conclusion, national traditional culture generates and remains alive in all over the country, and with the support of the governments will continue to contribute to the sustainability and prosperity of major cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 993, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Aren't
...ly valuable in cities tourism resource. Arent they worthy of governments support eith...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ational Film Festival annually attracts a large number of filmmakers, directors, actors, business...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 847, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Shouldn't
...the mode of their thought and behavior. Shouldnt the governments financially support suc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1045, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...rcial performance, and increasing these cities wealth for its future progress. In c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3553.0 2235.4752809 159% => OK
No of words: 620.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73064516129 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98996985923 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96836029673 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 354.0 215.323595506 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 1097.1 704.065955056 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.3924897112 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.19047619 118.986275619 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5238095238 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277327834758 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842245762944 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572679466822 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14911345684 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400536569739 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 48.8420337079 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 12.1639044944 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.38706741573 127% => OK
difficult_words: 220.0 100.480337079 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.