Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a

When governments spend money to develop something, people usually keep an eye on their behaviors. People will check every investment of the government including the scientific research budget. Some people think that it is useless to spend a lot of money on research that cannot know the following result, while others believe that this research can help people to have a better quality of life. Governments should spend their fund on medical research because it is preparation for unexpected diseases in the future and it might create new techniques to cure patients.

Investment in medical research to prepare for unknown diseases is important for every country. Researchers and doctors need a budget to study or analyze diseases. Without any budget, they cannot create new drugs to fight with new diseases. The coronavirus is one of the examples of new diseases that there is no country that can overcome the virus. Because there has been no disease pandemic for a long time, every government does not care about preparation to protect their countries from the coronavirus. Many governments did not do anything to prevent the spread of this virus until it was too late to control, and many people have had to die. If a country spends money on medical research, they will know how to control the spread although they cannot cure the virus immediately, or they might have some drugs that can be used to relieve the virus. All in all, giving a fund for medical research is necessary.

Additionally, scientists have an opportunity to discover new techniques to treat people. Scientists have a budget to study new things. Many equipment or techniques used today were from plenty of experiments. For example, X-ray machines are important equipment used to analyze the internal organs of patients. In the past, there was no one who knew the ability of this ray. A scientist got a budget to study this ray for a long time. Finally, he knew what the ray was and how to use it. This discovery has change medical treatment techniques a lot. Thus, the government's fund is one factor of success in studying new techniques.

Medical researchers should receive a budget from governments although they cannot assure any consequences. These researchers need money to prepare for unexpected things and to look for new techniques for treatment. If governments spend funds on this research, there will be only good results.

Votes
Average: 3.6 (7 votes)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so, thus, while, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02244389027 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73746408492 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463840399002 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9955608556 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9166666667 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119843940104 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040987604626 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364699551257 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932271687504 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452921047449 0.0667264976115 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.