The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
The greatness of a person can be defined by the evaluation of the philanthropic work done by him. There were many leaders or individuals in history to present, who had achieved the greatness in their life because of the paragon work. It is not necessarily true that the greatness of that person comes into picture after the demise. We have many examples who have proved their mettle of greatness and still doing it for noble cause.
Although, greatness can be called as a level of extant that has set the limit in a particular field. So, for some people, it may sense as normal achievement but accepted by world as excellent work as a whole.
The prominent example to support my argument is from history - Mahatma Gandhi. He was a great person who fought with Britishers for the freedom of India. He opted the way to fight with non-violence ideology. At first, his thinking was considered in jocular way but as the time passed, he became one of main leaders in the freedom movement of world's biggest democratic country. He was rewarded with the title of "Father of the nation", and played a great role to reform the country from scratch. Critics will argue with the time frame of his achievement and definitely, it took long for him to prove his thinking but in the end, he was not accepted as a great leader of the world. So, even great leaders of his time were also following him in his tenure of life.
From the history to the present life, there are many people who have been seen as a great leader. To bolster my argument, second example is, Sachin Tendulkar. He was a great Cricket Player and retired in last few years. But his greatness in his field was observed many of years ago. He had mastered his class and elegance in the cricket field which turned, many of people who never followed cricket, in his fan base. His greatness is an example of greatness acquired in the present time, while living those great moments.
The assertion of my viewpoint is that the greatness can be measured by time as a bar but it is not the only factor which decides it. There can be many examples in history who achieved it after they had gone, but its not universally true. One more example is Kailash Satyarthi, awarded by Nobel Peace Prize, along with Malala Yousufzai. Both persons has an age difference of more than 30 years in between them and the prize can be seen as the greatness of their work.
The greatness is something that comes into picture when it matters the most. Some great people has fallen after the line of their life but many examples are still living with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the biggest'.
Suggestion: worlds the biggest
...main leaders in the freedom movement of worlds biggest democratic country. He was rewarded wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 350, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ong with Malala Yousufzai. Both persons has an age difference of more than 30 years...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240671641791 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.151119402985 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0671641791045 0.0880659088768 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0335820895522 0.0497285424764 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0783582089552 0.0444667217837 176% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.151119402985 0.12292977631 123% => OK
Participles: 0.0485074626866 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4886078461 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0130597014925 0.030933414821 42% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0932835820896 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0149253731343 0.0249443105267 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0223880597015 0.0148568991511 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2709.0 2732.02544248 99% => OK
No of words: 484.0 452.878318584 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59710743802 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.293388429752 0.366273622748 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223140495868 0.280924506359 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134297520661 0.200843997647 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0867768595041 0.132149295362 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4886078461 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45867768595 0.48968727796 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 52.0647907828 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6153846154 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3849924563 59.4972553346 53% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.192307692 141.124799967 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.346153846154 0.674092028746 51% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 40.9294342022 51.4728631049 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.67375886525 1.64882698954 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407461809586 0.391690518653 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120726127525 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0904167316949 0.077325440228 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546044782116 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169698816194 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149349242319 0.161403998019 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18887544378 0.0892212321368 212% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.310619339966 0.385218514788 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0941871912565 0.0692045440612 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32429435772 0.275328986314 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.293844170767 0.0653680567796 450% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.5995575221 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.