Beliefs, from my perspective, are what differ us from brutal indifferent animals. Incentives and eagerness for better life are the results of beliefs, in other words, our pursing for social status, academic achievement and family harmony together initate from our beliefs. Thus I would rather die on feet than surrender on keen compromise my beliefs. Besides, the statement arguing that compromise our beliefs will be harmful is not convincing and rational as my following descriptions.
To begin with, in the crystal river of human history almost celebrities are those who adhere to their beliefs. For an artist, sticking to their beloved style rather than being obdient toward trend definitely would bother their economy status, yet he or she could achieve anything but independent success. Standing on precedents' shoulders is not incorrect, but having belief in innovation is the ultimate goal. For instance, in Da Vinci's time not a single viewer admired his work, since it was the early stage of Renaissance and all painters are drawing the Classical. Therefore Da Vinci had to reluctantly take subsidy from the Florida royals who he did not appreciate at all. And his Mona Lisa became a royal's decorum in bathroom, almost ruining tha masterpiece. Yet Da Vinci adhere to his belief in innovation against dull tradition of art, he even started to institude a module of human body, which is hibited by the Roman Cathedal. All he had done could be very harmful to his own benefit, yet he stick to his belief.
And in the field of scientific research, adhering to the belief that analyse and statics tell no lie is of vital significance. Belief in pursing truth is scientists basic moral standards. Even facing with persecution and insult by other scientists, one still have to move forward to prove his claims. Alan Turing, the father of artifical intelligence, was accused of homosex and jeered at his inability to build such a giant machine to do simple job. Yet he broke the obstacles and never gave up until he managed to develop the first deciphering machine in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...mony together initate from our beliefs. Thus I would rather die on feet than surrend...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rational as my following descriptions. To begin with, in the crystal river of h...
^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...all painters are drawing the Classical. Therefore Da Vinci had to reluctantly take subsid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'royals'' or 'royal's'?
Suggestion: royals'; royal's
...iate at all. And his Mona Lisa became a royals decorum in bathroom, almost ruining tha...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1002, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sticks'.
Suggestion: sticks
...very harmful to his own benefit, yet he stick to his belief. And in the field of s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... build such a giant machine to do simple job. Yet he broke the obstacles and neve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03170028818 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70921575575 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631123919308 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5510042774 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.705882353 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11565292044 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354601431544 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253867506387 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715522456094 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00979082608 0.0667264976115 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.