Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
It is no doubt that law has been playing an important role in human society from ancient to modern times. It doesn’t only become the stabilizer of the society, but the code of every member in our society. The body of law in a nation is a complex system, consisting of a series of laws and regulations, for example, hundreds of laws and thousands of local regulations have been enacted by the Chinese government at present. How complex the body of the law is, so I disagree the statement that laws are flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
First of all, if laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places, legislators will be obliged to constantly track the changes of various kinds of things that exist in our society, resulting in the increase of their work volume and the rise of the social cost from investigation of the fact to the enactment of new laws. At the same time, it seems to be a challenging and impossible task for legislators to take account of various circumstances, times, and places, because sometimes human beings must admit the limitation of their ability of cognition. On the other hand, laws are the code of people’s behavior in a society. Laws that take account of various circumstances, times, and places might reach the expected effect. For instance, an offender who runs red lights will be fined ten yuan each time, which is enacted in China new traffic laws in order to punish the ‘Chinese way of crossing the road’. In spite of this, the phenomenon didn’t disappear. I think it is a wiser way to educate people rather than punish them by economic sanction.
Secondly, laws being flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places will make lawyers, judges, and juries more difficult to assess the guilt to what laws should be applied. For one thing, they must learn so many tomes of laws and remember these obscure articles of law, and, most importantly, update these knowledge, which are a huge project of spending a great deal of energy and time. for another, people’s memory is far less than the capacity of computers and it is more difficult to correctly locate the curtained articles, compared to computers. So, facing the increasing articles of laws, they will be harder to assess the guilt, and even make mistakes in handling cases, not to mention that the ordinary people would be confused by so many articles of laws.
In addition, flexible laws taking account of various circumstances, times, and places may supply criminals more opportunities to plead for themselves. In general, offenders like to find legal loopholes in order to exonerate them. They try to find the difference between the traditional laws and the new laws to be absolved or extenuate their crimes.
In conclusion, I deem that it isn’t advisable that laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...s of law, and, most importantly, update these knowledge, which are a huge project of spending a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ending a great deal of energy and time. for another, people's memory is far le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, first of all, for one thing, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98011928429 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85655792253 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489065606362 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1819415573 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.842105263 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4736842105 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.89473684211 5.21951772744 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.587713669789 0.243740707755 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202796867702 0.0831039109588 244% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224559024645 0.0758088955206 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421409882768 0.150359130593 280% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166478810337 0.0667264976115 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.