Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and

Essay topics:

Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The author of the issue highlights that concentrate on a special field of research might result in significant discoveries accidentally. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general agreement on this question. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that although there is a possibility to create different questions during an especial research, nobody could neglect the importance of every given research. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.

To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that new invention plays an important role in every given society and guarantee a nation's success in the future. But not all these inventions are accidental. Broadly speaking, crowds of nations allocate a substantial amount of budget to researchers or universities in order to increase discoveries day in day out. In fact, as science and technology are improving dramatically in all around the world more and more question will come to scientists' mind about an especial field of research and it might result in various future research. But these new questions will not have acceptable outcomes unless creating a good plan and enough investigation in that field. To elucidate more on this issue, not only new discoveries but also every work need a meticulous program and not until scientist focus on their research can they get a good result. As a matter of fact, think about questions created during research might not allow researchers to work precisely and may confuse them. Indeed, they should make an effort to find an acceptable solution for those questions in the next steps.

Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that if scientists pay attention to different questions while doing a research in an especial case, it might allow scholars not to be responsible for their actions. Generally phrased, if everything is going to happen by an accident, there is no need to make a plan and think wisely about a subject and new invention will discover spontaneously. This situation will provide an opportunity not only for scholars but also people live in the society not to be responsible. Delve further into the issue, do not take the responsibility of action will certainly provide fertile ground for researchers do something wrong and hardly can a society make a progress without taking responsibilities into consideration. So, we will not witness precise results in new discoveries if they just have done with chances. Indeed, it is not wisely to take chances into account during discoveries and creations.

However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, with the advent of new technologies myriads of questions will come to human's mind about the various field of research, which improve people's motivation and incentive to find an answer to many questions created during a research. Arguably, this situation will provide an opportunity for the scientist to discover known problem accidentally without even previous thinking. These accidental creations might provide a chance for future research to be done as easily as possible.

In the light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that various kinds of discoveries need a meticulous program and not all creations are accidental.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...th, it is established beyond doubt that new invention plays an important role in every given ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... in every given society and guarantee a nations success in the future. But not all thes...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...tion to different questions while doing a research in an especial case, it might allow sch...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...an and think wisely about a subject and new invention will discover spontaneously. This situa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ing wrong and hardly can a society make a progress without taking responsibilities into co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...answer to many questions created during a research. Arguably, this situation will provide ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, broadly speaking, in fact, as a matter of fact, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2854.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27541589649 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04169397568 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480591497227 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 891.9 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3802360869 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.086956522 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5217391304 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117837109299 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358636904049 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358105416144 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767053405919 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019295495221 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.