A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It depends upon the variety in regions covered by any country that determine the subjects that should be thought at schools. No nation can afford the repercussions of homogenizing curriculum to the one that does not account for versatility rife in culture. Additionally, there are several benefits of having a uniform education system. To get the best of both worlds one can suggest that a conditional approach should be taken into consideration, that also addresses the interest of students. Further discussion is on the pros and cons of both approaches and what can be done to achieve and ideal solution.
To begin with, uniform curriculum promises that an egalitarian system is established for further admissions into universities and colleges. This guarantees equal grounds for competition. More over the problem with students who had to migrate from their state will be resolved. Performance evaluation of any two students from different parts of countries will be more fruitful. Take for an example, Finland, the country recently implemented this approach to ensure that same education is provided to every child in the nation.
However, the uniform education system might fail in vast countries like China and India and middle eastern nations, these countries are rife with discreet cultures and have varied milieu. No state is similar to another. Therefore, having a curriculum which educates general knowledge of regional language, religion and history becomes a necessity in these states. Take for an example India. As India has more than 10 regional languages,which vary form state to state, students need to learn the grammar and language spoken in their states.
On the other hand, a curriculum that suggests uniformity of core subjects like science, maths and arts and gives options to choose from localized subjects like language and agriculture, solves the problem from both schools of approaches. When it comes to analogy, these students can be evaluated on basis of their scores in core subjects only, thus they can freely opt for studies of regional programs that interest them and never stay behind of students from other states.
Conclusively, uniform education has its own benefits and heterogeneous societies have there own requirements. Therefore a solution that addresses both issues should be provided to students for their betterment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...ndia has more than 10 regional languages,which vary form state to state, students need...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...nefits and heterogeneous societies have there own requirements. Therefore a solution that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... societies have there own requirements. Therefore a solution that addresses both issues s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, thus, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41935483871 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8555372452 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556451612903 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6985516726 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.105263158 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127522373301 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395796201255 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273066695998 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713732748847 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160777024501 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.