A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.

When a nation requires all of its students to follow exactly the same study program before they enter college they will al get the same sort of classes with the same theory. This requirement will not lead to improvement of quality and will not lead to diversity of people or the trigger to develop person specific qualities. I'm not against rules which indicate schools to learn their students what is necessary in college, but I would point out that a national curriculum may prove detrimental rather than beneficial.

First of all, a national curriculum leads to students with exactly the same pre-education. Having the same knowledge does not lead to diversity, as diversity is required to have discussions and discussions lead to learning. Future employers prefer to choose between different candidates than that they have to choose between candidates with exactly the same knowledge.

In addition, a national curriculum does not give students the freedom to choose between schools because the curriculum is exactly the same. Student do have preferences in sort of education which are limited by a national curriculum. I their future live they also have to choose.

Secondly, students are not triggered if they have to follow classes because they are required. Freedom to choose gives students the opportunity to develop their own qualities and interests. For example, someone who is excellent in engineering but awful in arts will never become a professional painter. Instead of invest time in learning arts he should have te possibility to explore more about engineering. In addition, students who are very motivated may become lazy if they have to follow classes which are boring.

To summarise, requiring does not improve the diversity of students and does not give students the possibility to follow their talents and interest. I would recommend to have clear guidelines about what all students need to know, because everyone have to have a wide basis knowledge whatever their talents or interest are. A national test would be more beneficial then, than having a national curriculum.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
When a nation requires all of its students t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...r to develop person specific qualities. Im not against rules which indicate school...
^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend having'.
Suggestion: recommend having
...low their talents and interest. I would recommend to have clear guidelines about what all student...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 364, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... national test would be more beneficial then, than having a national curriculum.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, sort of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22485207101 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78486458321 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479289940828 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6348325735 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.882352941 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267330452612 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974401791811 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728668518639 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168342398743 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572668217901 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.