Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nature is the mother of life. It is essential to exist life on earth. Modern infrastructure, technological and economic development is necessary, but it is too expensive, if cost is payed by destroying nature. All the nations in the world need to come forward and work toward preserving nature, then only our future generations can survive on earth. To make sure that wilderness is not compromised with economic gain, nations need to make laws.
Now days, Delhi capital of India is in the news for highest rate of pollution. One of the reason for this, is less trees in the city. India is a developing country, struggling to all sorts of issues such as poverty, unemployment, and now the biggest issue is air pollution in Delhi. The problem with developing countries is that, economic gains take over nature most of the time, whose consequences now Delhi is paying. India was not able to make strict laws to preserve wilderness areas in the country. Natural areas are getting destroyed everyday, to build shopping malls, houses, or other business complexes, due to which pollution rate is increasing. Now there urgent need for the country, to make strict laws, to breath in clean air.
Other reason, in the support of statement is if wild areas will not be preserved in their natural states, then where the wild animals will go. They might come to the areas where people live and can be harmful for human life. Even this has happened in many rural areas, where the forest land, people had used for their housing purposes, and wild animals came to that area to find food. All the wild animals are the part of life cycle on earth, without them, it can't be said that human life will exist on this beautiful planet. To take care of the safety measure of people, the nations need to work on making laws to save forests.
On the other side, human beings are using natural areas for their pleasure or research purpose. To do that some work needs to be done in wild areas, so that these areas will have some access to humans, like making roads, maintaining some camping areas in the forest, putting signs what are the safe areas to visit, putting trail maps.
Thus, there is no doubt about that the nations need to make laws to preserve wild areas in their natural state, but some work can be done in these areas, to give limited access to people. In this way, the nations can make sure that nature is preserved, and nature lovers and wild life researchers can do their job without disturbing wild life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...llution. One of the reason for this, is less trees in the city. India is a developin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the time, whose consequences now Delhi is paying. India was not able to make st...
^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ry. Natural areas are getting destroyed everyday, to build shopping malls, houses, or ot...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, as for, as to, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68778280543 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36219464804 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495475113122 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6540412205 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26651512855 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845224955304 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525068963521 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152857493944 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265960155888 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.