Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning

Essay topics:

Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The statement suggests that nations should stop funding arts when some of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. However, the government funding for arts, which helps arts flourish, does not threaten the economic condition; yet, it promotes the overall employment situation. Nations should therefore not cease to fund arts.

Many people currently work in the art-related fields. Arts have many forms such as movies, museums, music, literature, stage performances, and many others. A considerable number of people are employed in these areas such as movie staff, actors, and artists. These people can keep their job only if arts are prosperous, which is largely dependent on government funding. If adopting the recommendation, arts will dwindle, and subsequently a significant number of people will lose their jobs. Therefore, nations should not stop funding to make the already existing unemployment worse

To continue, arts inspire creativities and therefore promote the overall success of a nation’s economy which consequently help increase employment market. Arts are ubiquitous in the economic world such as advertising, construction, and home goods. For examples, virtually every company is trying to advertise their products by creating the most captivating images, which relates to art. With companies grow, the overall economy, which will then increase employment opportunities. If adopting the policy, the economy will be deprived of a major source of creativity, arts, which will cause the job market to decline. Hence, it is necessary for a nation to keep funding arts so as to bolster the overall economy and the job market.

In addition, people have the rights and needs to enjoy the work of arts. Admittedly, many people are hungry in virtually every country. Still, the majority of people are working and paying taxes and need all kinds of arts for entertainment and empowerment. It is not right for a nation to suspend funding for arts, diminish their advancement, and violate people’s needs. This is especially true for those low-income workers as they often rely on free access to arts. If adopting the policy, many art events would not be free, leaving many citizens to miss opportunities of enjoying a more colorful and nourishment life. Therefore, though a number of people are unemployed, a nation should not suspend funding for arts.

In conclusion, a nation should never stop looking at different ways to solve its unemployment issue; nevertheless, suspending government funding for arts is not one of them.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ssary for a nation to keep funding arts so as to bolster the overall economy and the job...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he overall economy and the job market. In addition, people have the rights and ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... funding for arts is not one of them.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41604010025 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93905362204 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518796992481 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7125518597 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2272727273 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296456513946 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959671568689 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727843448303 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185104149727 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563346647957 0.0667264976115 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
The topic is 'Nations should suspend government funding for the arts', there are still private funding or individual funding available. So the argument 2 and argument 3 have issues.

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 399 350
No. of Characters: 2070 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.469 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.188 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.769 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 158 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.348 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.147 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.739 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.324 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.512 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5