As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Until recent years of 21century, people manufacture behavior science toward technology in order to help handicapped people. Most scientists and engineer scientists expect that this would be another level of helping people. Developing technology is based on what people interested in and which experimental result or hypothesis would be beneficial to people. In this argument, when people depends on technology too much, the human’s ability would be deteriorated. Some of pinpoint in this notion would be possible to happen, and the other possibility would be comparison with this argument.
On the one hand, technology possibly affects human’s ability, but that doesn’t mean that human’s ability will be deteriorated. Physical engineering informs and acknowledges how robotic technology works. Scientists in this field make robot so that people do not need to be in serious danger circumstances. For example, firefighters don’t need to sacrifice themselves to save people in dangerous situation. Another view of this field is for handicapped people, it makes artificial arms or legs so that handicapped people doesn’t feel uncomfortable. If there is some of errors in techniques, people have to think about the other ways of work or they have to resume the work. Most of fixation or revolutionary work is still involved with human’s ability, this will hardly to change.
On the other hand, there is a little but very important objection in this argument. Technology would be helpful in recent social lives. However, people still don’t know when technology complete; they will keep make technology better and better so that human society would be very comfortable, and when it comes to end of completion in technology, this can be disaster. Recently, there is super-computer interrelated with more than 100 computers, artificial brain called Alpha-go, this computer played with incumbent master go, Mr. Lee. There was five plays, people expected that Mr. Lee would win but turned out he lost. This astonished people couldn’t beat the system. Moreover, there is medical diagnosis computer, which can detect at least 99% of cancer, which can be more efficient than human. Also, there is computer thinker, which can spread the ideas better than human. If there is more technologies made from human, there would be another problem such as human’s ability deterioration. People should reconsider which is best for human, not to be deterioration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the errors') or simply say ''some errors''.
Suggestion: some of the errors; some errors
...'t feel uncomfortable. If there is some of errors in techniques, people have to think abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 614, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'out the lost'?
Suggestion: out the lost
...ected that Mr. Lee would win but turned out he lost. This astonished people couldn't b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 891, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are more technologies'?
Suggestion: there are more technologies
... spread the ideas better than human. If there is more technologies made from human, there would be another...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, at least, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06604103673 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8724205104 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22073646277 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073253363844 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552291572296 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155035391063 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479805824294 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.